Mutiny in Sewing Masters 5: Two contestants refuse to audition for going "against their principles"

• MomenTVs Masters of sewing 5 lives a historical abandonment for "mental health"

• Sewing masters Verónica Forqué and a last silent goodbye

Rebellion in

.

The use of fur in the first test last night of

caused an outbreak of riot between two contestants,

and

.

When

gave way to the models and after explaining the test, she realized that something was happening.

's faces

were a real poem.

Without opening her mouth,

kept shaking her head.

"What's wrong,

asked her,

seeing strange behavior in her.

What happened, the same thing that happened to

, is that neither of them was going to put their principles at stake for a

, nor for a

, nor for much immunity that was in the running.

Well, the controversy was already served, although

treated the rebellion on board with much more delicacy than could be expected.

They did not want to take the test, disqualification and another butterfly thing.

In other editions, something like this could have caused a full-fledged tsunami, even sending both directly to elimination.

But this time, no.

was sympathetic to the reluctance of the two contestants, accepted the arguments of both and let them not do the test without further ado.

Missing more!

The theme of the use of skins, of animals in both

and

It is always the generator of a bomb that explodes without control.

There is no oven for buns or to add fuel to the fire.

So it is accepted, the test continues and that the downpour that falls is not too deadly.

The apprentices had to make a closure with a buttonhole and a button on a piece of leather.

While

explained the test,

repeated once "I can't, I can't".

"The test is in leather or suede, but it is not our desire to force you to do anything. Here you have to make your decisions,"

told him, seeing the anguish that

had .

"No, I can't,"

reiterated to

.

"I'm not going to do the test because I don't feel comfortable. It's something that isn't ethical at all for me, so it doesn't represent me and I don't want to do the test," she explained to the camera later.

"It's your decision. We're going to respect it,"

, aware of everything that could lead to a harsher reaction from the Sewing Masters.

Solving the mess with

,

gave the starting signal for the apprentices to run to the haberdashery to get the material they needed for the test.

However, another front was going to open up.

stayed at her stationary workshop, but so did

.

saw her, she approached her and asked her.

"I am vegan, vegan for more than 10 years,"

explained .

"Ah, you're not going to do the test either," snapped

.

"No, I can't. I collaborate with sanctuaries and I can't sew some skin here. It's impossible. And look, I like that apron! But I can't (...) I know I'm losing that golden apron, you don't know what This is going to hurt me, but they are my principles and on my principles not everything is worth me to win".

There was nothing more to add.

said no more and let neither of the two contestants carry out the test that violated their principles.

Caterina

was the most overwhelmed because in her head she wanted to do the test, but in her heart she couldn't use fur.

What a bad time, not only that of the apprentices but also that

, aware that this is the type of network through which the program is later slapped left and right.

So it was.

is one of the most commented programs on networks and between the use of animal skins for the test and the decision of

and

the shoemaker was already mounted.

To top it off,

.

The apprentice says she has the same principles as

and

, but... But they must not be so firm or that golden apron, which in the end was not worn, must weigh more than said principles.

"Yes, yes, I am also vegan, but here I have no principles, I want that apron. Forgive me," she told the scrap of cloth before cutting it.

In short, it is better not to comment, it is better to remain silent because

's role belongs to Oscar.

María Escoté lights up in Sewing Masters: "You are wrong"

The apprentices carried out the test assessing the difficulty of treating the skin and it was when the judges approached each position in the workshop to make their assessment that the thing ended up exploding.

The first was

.

While the apprentice explained to the judges what she had done with her and

corrected her for not speaking properly about her,

was getting more and more turned on.

Then came

's question : "Have you encountered any problems?"

And then

took her principles out for a walk.

"Basically I don't eat meat, but I want that apron, so I've left my values ​​parked. I understand

and Isa, but, daughter, I wanted the apron", she assured

, who responded with "it's your decision,

", while

and

were about to burst. "My dream for fashion is much more greater than the damage by animals.

I have asked her forgiveness, I have wished her to have had a beautiful death and that she has not suffered and that's it,"

continued justifying herself . If it is that where there is nowhere to cut...

"It's just that touch your nose,"

snapped suddenly .

"She does not eat meat, but she eats fish and eats eggs and eats milk. She is not vegan or vegetarian.

, what you say, no,"

when the judges had already moved on to another loom

.

And this is where you have to make him look at it.

Indeed,

put the contest before her principles and

and

stood firm.

Both positions are equally respectable.

The problem is when you try to justify a decision with arguments that are not real.

What

reproached

is that it was classified as vegan when in reality what

does is not eat meat.

In other words, the decision to continue with the test had nothing to do with the decision and the values ​​of

and

.

Come on, paper.

But it is also true that

can make the decision that she considers and that she must be respected in the same way that

respected that of

and

.

It's an absurd debate whether she doesn't eat meat, if she eats fish, if she is X or Y. The justification, bad, but the "

, what you say, no", too.

But

, who gives me that she was not very sure of the decision she had made not to do the test, continued raca-raca with

, which caused

, who was listening, to take action on the matter.

"I didn't like what

said because she doesn't eat meat, but she eats fish, she eats eggs, she eats milk, she eats everything. Both Isa and I don't eat anything that comes from animals," he told

,

.

The designer's reaction was not going to be small.

"

, one thing, we have respected your opinion and your work, please, be respectful of your partner's opinion and your partner's work.

Why are you attacking

questioned him

.

"Because the phrase of I have left my values ​​​​...", he tried to answer, but

cut her off before.

"I don't think

is good . Everyone has respected you with these issues. So I'm going to ask you not to throw dirt on your partner and to leave her alone. It seems very ugly to me. You are not being respectful with your companion", asked

.

"

, you're wrong," insisted

.

"No, you're wrong," she tried to cut to the

, and she cut.

ended up apologizing to

for not having understood what her partner was referring to, but deep down and not so deep down,

apologized for not turning on the confrontation with

.

The faces said it all, more than the words.

Masters of sewing 5 does justice to Borja

Even those of María Escoté that when the winner of the test was going to be announced, which was finally

, and, therefore, the winner of the golden apron, he had the face of rigor mortis.

And it is that if

tried by all means to keep the controversy as little as possible, the confrontation between

and

dismantled all intentions.

I understand that skin is part of the world of fashion, but it is opening a melon that always ends up bursting in the end because it is one of the polemics that has the most extreme poles.

Luckily,

' joy relaxed the atmosphere a bit and they were able to go to the outdoor test and the playoffs a little calmer.

With

still warm - tell Will Smith -,

went to

, the company that best unifies fashion with cinema, theater or television.

Led by two-time Oscar nominee as costume director and winner of two Goyas,

, the apprentices had to replicate two costumes from the series

.

The inequality between the two teams has been more than manifest.

The orange team, made up of

,

,

and

did a more than disappointing job, while the green team, made up of

,

and

, got all the praise for getting a more than decent result.

But while some replicated the costumes of

, they also had to find the repechado who, honestly, was more than sung after the unfair and surprising expulsion of

last week.

They were given the

wardrobe and, of course,

became a contestant by right of

.

Any other decision would have been a major scandal.

"It's impeccable. You've been able to perfectly translate what the test consisted of; here's the perfect reinterpretation of a uniform. Also, it can be used for both, it's the perfect balance. It can be a uniform or it can be an ideal casual street look ", praised

's work

.

returns to fight for victory.

The one who will no longer fight is

, the last to arrive at the Sewing Masters workshop

, she was saying goodbye to her dream last night.

, who had dropped everything to get into

after being the replacement for

, was thanked by the judges and the program.

No thanks is any consolation when the opportunity is gone.

Conforms to The Trust Project criteria

Know more

• sewing masters

Jesus expelledMasters of sewing 5 |

Verónica Forqué and a last goodbye that silences

Anthony, expelled Masters of sewing 5 lives a historical abandonment for "mental health"

Margarita, expelledMasters of sewing 5 |

The anxiety attack that scared everyone

See links of interest

• Last News

• Oscar Winners 2022

• Will Smith Oscar Awards

• Last News

• Where to watch Oscar movies

• The best schools in Spain

• Home THE WORLD today

• Work calendar 2022

• UCAM Murcia - Barca

• Spain - Iceland, live

• Poland - Sweden, live

• Portugal - North Macedonia, live