China News Service, February 9. According to the official WeChat news of the Liaoning High Court, on the 9th, the Liaoning Provincial Higher People's Court issued a second-instance public judgment on the appellant Liu Dong's case of endangering public safety by dangerous methods, and ruled to reject the appeal and uphold the original judgment. And reported to the Supreme People's Court for approval of Liu Dong's death in accordance with the law.

　　The Liaoning Provincial Higher People's Court found out after hearing that: At about 11:40 on May 22, 2021, the appellant Liu Dong drove his BMW car west to east along Wuhui Road, Zhongshan District, Dalian City, because he failed to accept the investment. In reality, he suddenly accelerated, deliberately ran a red light, and rammed into pedestrians crossing the zebra crossing on the sidewalk at the north gate of Wuhui Road Labor Park, causing five deaths, two serious injuries, four minor injuries, and two injuries.

After that, Liu Dong continued to drive to the intersection of Wuhui Road and Jiefang Road. After rear-ending a van, he stopped. Liu Dong abandoned the car and fled the scene. He was brought to justice that afternoon.

　　The first-instance judgment of the Intermediate People's Court of Dalian City, Liaoning Province found that the defendant Liu Dong constituted the crime of endangering public security by a dangerous method, and sentenced him to death and deprivation of political rights for life.

After the sentence was pronounced, the defendant Liu Dong refused to accept and appealed.

After a public hearing, the court of second instance held that the appellant, Liu Dong, vented his emotions in extreme ways due to his investment failure. He drove at a higher speed on public roads in the central area of ​​the city, deliberately ran red lights, and rammed into pedestrians who were crossing the road on the sidewalk, causing many deaths and injuries. Injury and property damage to others, the means are particularly cruel, the circumstances are particularly bad, the consequences are particularly serious, the criminal motive is extremely despicable, the social harm and the crime are extremely serious, the facts determined by the court of first instance are clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, the sentencing is appropriate, and the trial procedure Legally, the above ruling was made.