Portraying the victim

Here we are told that Canadian health official Carrie Bourassa, an Aboriginal health expert and professor at the related research institute, turned out to be a fake Aboriginal and lost her job.

OK.

But why are we surprised? Already in 2015, there was such a girl in the state of Montana - Rachel Dolezal (aka Nkechi Amare Diallo), who was all such a terrible activist, defended the black population from the attacks of millions of white American fascists as part of her position as president of the branch of the National Association for the Promotion of Progress Colored Population (NAACP). And she even claimed that her real father was African American, told how she had to endure monstrous racism as a child.

True, later it turned out that her parents were white Christians. And only realizing that on the basis of black nationalism it is possible to rise rather robustly, she began to smear her face with paint, changed her name to one that should hint to us that she is black, and so on. But when she completely lost her shores and began to tell that she had become a victim of a racially motivated crime, her own parents, who were fed up with it all, could no longer stand it, and they declared that she was born a white woman and, in fact, she was. A scandal erupted and she was fired from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Her black "brothers" accused her of racial appropriation and fraud.

That is, finally, we are observing the process of mimicry - in a society where it is beneficial to be a victim, there will always be enough people who will fight for the status of a victim by any, the most fraudulent means.

And these are no longer isolated cases, but a trend.

So this Canadian official, Carrie Bourassa, decided that she is now a special Canadian mestizo (to be honest, all this gives off in terms of dog breeding).

True, later it turned out that all her ancestors and other parents were from Russia, the Czech Republic and Poland, which caused the discontent of special Canadian mestizos, who spent their whole lives on being listed as such, since this also brings all sorts of government nishtyaks.

But, as in the case of the fake-black Dolezal, the lady was let down by a sense of proportion.

For some reason, such characters always do not feel the edge when they should stop and not replay.

But Burassa has already gone completely crazy, and she came to speak at the TEDx conference at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon "in full Bukharian Jewry", as Ilf said with Petrov: draped in a blue shawl, with a feather in partially braided hair and with an appeal to to the public.

“My name is Morning Star Bear,” she said with tears in her eyes to the cheers of the crowd.

“I am from the clan of bears.

I am an Anishinaabe mestizo from the Territory of the Fourth Treaty, ”she said, talking about her poor childhood, which was fraught with violence.

As I say, being a minority and a victim has become inexpressibly beneficial in a crazy world. But her colleagues from the university, where she was listed as a professor, looking at all this, exclaimed, like Stanislavsky: "I don't believe!" (or was it Nemirovich-Danchenko?) and looked closely at her family roots, in which there was no place for the primitive Canadian population. And they brought the fake mestizo to clean water. Of course, she, like any left-wing activist who is taken for a causal place, began to lie and twist, changing the version - stating that she was accepted into the mestizo community by an unnamed friend of her deceased grandfather Clifford Larock. And so on.

What we see, of course, is already some incredible degree of careerism.

But we are already accustomed to the fact that people for the sake of a career not only change their beliefs, betray loved ones, destroy friends ... But to smear their faces with shoe polish is something completely new.

You don't even know whether to laugh or be horrified.

But then we now understand what these people have in their heads.

But this is already really awful.

The only thing that surprises me in all this is why, after all, you cannot call yourself a Negro, if you are not a Negro.

After all, you can officially call yourself a woman, without even shaving off your mustache, only on the basis of the fact that you feel like a woman.

And if your own mother is raped, you will be sent to a women's prison.

You are now a de jure woman.

It doesn't matter that this whole scheme completely denies science, nature and man as a species.

Said "woman" means a woman.

But why, then, are the anti-racist fighters so fiercely defending traditional race science?

Why do they tell us that a person who feels that he was born a Negro in a white family cannot be a de jure Negro?

Or a special Canadian mestizo?

Maybe a woman in a man's body, but not a black man in a white woman's body?

So you will already decide where nature can be raped for political reasons, and where not.

And then somehow it turns out quite caricatured.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.