News 1+1丨"Dog bites people", what happened to the dog owner?

  Recently, the "dog biting" incident in Anyang, Henan has received widespread attention from the society.

The parties involved refused to acknowledge the fact that the dog bit the elderly, and the management units bucked each other, which disappointed the reporters who reported the incident 10 times in a row.

For the incident on September 20, the parties did not apologize until November 19.

On November 23, Anyang City made a decision on the responsible units and persons responsible for the incident.

Why was the trivial matter of the "dog biting" incident in Anyang dragged down?

Why does a simple "small" matter need so much trouble to solve?

What is the confidence that the dog owner refuses to apologize?

  Yang Xiaojun, professor of the Political and Legal Education and Research Department of the Central Party School (National School of Administration): I think his confidence comes from his ability to handle relevant departments.

The common people often say that the section chief of a certain competent department in a city may really be regarded as an official in the locality.

The "dog biting people" incident can be delayed for two months, including the public security, urban management, and market supervision. His own units are working hard to suppress and push this matter. This shows that he can handle these departments, so I think his source of confidence Because of his adequate network.

Why did the party's unit use law enforcement equipment to deal with the injured?

  Yang Xiaojun, a professor of the Political and Legal Education and Research Department of the Central Party School (National School of Administration): The unit of the party involved is a law enforcement agency under the Anyang Market Supervision Bureau.

This unit is equipped with telescopic sticks. This telescopic stick may not have been approved by the public security organs, and the public security organs may not care about this. This is called non-police standard equipment, but it is the law enforcement equipment of this unit.

Why does the unit use law enforcement equipment to deal with the injured?

Because I want to suppress the "dog biting" incident.

So I just mentioned that some units are dragging, some are pushing, and some are pressing.

Obviously, this department wants to keep things under control. If it doesn't work, it will use force, law enforcement equipment and law enforcement methods. I think this is a very obvious problem.

Anyang, Henan, Deeply Rethinking the "Dog Bites" Incident

  On the afternoon of the 23rd, Anyang City, Henan Province held a city-wide party members and cadres "change style, improve efficiency" warning education and rectification meeting.

The meeting mentioned that the "dog biting people" incident exposed six problems in some local units and cadres.

In fact, Anyang promulgated the "Interim Regulations on the Management of Dog Raising in the Urban Area of ​​Anyang City" as early as 2011.

It can be seen from this "dog biting people" incident that the local departments involved in the resolution process all bucked each other.

The core problem is "do not want to do, act falsely, act chaotically"

  Regarding the 6-point summary of the "not enterprising and not wanting to do, seeking stability and fear of chaos, not being able to do anything, lacking in skills, being passive and lazy, acting pretending to behave, and pursuing power for personal chaos", Yang Xiaojun emphasized:( 1) If you don't want to make progress, you just don't want to do anything, so don't use other things to cover up this core point.

(2) Pretending to be pretending to behave, this so-called supervision, what they are supervising, they have methods and means, he just doesn't want to do it.

(3) Use power to seek private affairs. When you go to the department concerned, he wants to suppress you, and even uses law enforcement methods to abuse his power.

Why is there a situation in which the competent authorities shirk each other?

  Yang Xiaojun, professor of the Department of Politics and Law Education and Research of the Central Party School (National School of Administration): There are regulations, and they are very clear. The current problem lies in non-compliance with the regulations.

For example, large dogs and sturdy dogs cannot be kept in urban areas. This is the case across the country, but the competent authorities have done it.

When a dispute arises, it needs to be handled by the department that approved the raising of large dogs. The two departments of public security and urban management should jointly investigate and deal with the dispute, including an apology for the dispute.

In fact, the reason behind the excuse is that they do not want to deal with this matter, so there is a problem at the implementation level, not the regulation level.

Resolving similar incidents requires the implementation of the "first accountability system"

  Yang Xiaojun, professor of the Department of Politics and Law Education and Research of the Central Party School (National School of Administration): For any implementation-level issues, combined with the example of Anyang, there are two points that are particularly worthy of our attention.

One is the "first accountability system", that is, whoever accepts the case and the people find it must be done to the end. This system has already become a reality in many cities, so that there will be no blaming each other, and the parties will not be exhausted. Find people everywhere.

The second is that if a party’s request is reflected, how long the competent authority must complete the process, and specify a specific time, regardless of whether a conclusion is reached, the results and reasons must be made public and subject to the supervision of the whole society.