There is a well-known maxim that knowledge is infinite.
So it is outdated.
New maxims limit cognition.
Now there is a set of grounded - attention!
- the ethics of postulates.
It is not allowed to go beyond the boundaries.
Recently, the whole world somehow tried to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the start of the release of the first film about Harry Potter. This, if anyone is in a tank, is the most ambitious art project in history. Yes, Star Wars or some of the Avengers can argue with him. But only to argue. Because Harry Potter, firstly, was an individual literary project, and not a synthetic work of dozens of professional screenwriters armed with modern software systems with ready-made databases of plots and characters. The project of a writer, comparable in the power of her talent with Dostoevsky. And if you want to open a discussion on this right now, then at first just take and read her novels, starting somewhere from the third. And then come and debate.
And secondly, the development of this literary project was influenced by the cinematic project that was developing in parallel to it. And this has never happened before in history. And the films, or rather, the actors who played the main roles in these films, influenced the way J.K. Rowling described her characters in subsequent novels.
In the normal world of normal people, these people would be inseparable. But this is in the normal world of normal people. In the world of new ethics, J.K. Rowling, the creator of the most important literary project in human history (well, the Bible is more important), was simply not invited to the celebration of the anniversary of the cinematic project created based on her works. Do you know why? Because she said something about “transgender people”. Rather, she dared to state that a woman is a woman. And a man is a man. And there are no transitions between them. A man cannot give birth to a child. A woman cannot conceive a child without the participation of a man.
The statement of this obvious and elementary fact caused such a resonance among people who deny nature that not only did they not invite J.K. Rowling to celebrate the anniversary of her project - they also published her home address on the Internet.
For those like them to come there and insist on their "transgender transitions."
However, insignificance parasitizing on the stars is a common thing.
But the new ethics does not only affect these nonentities.
It literally hits the squares.
British actor Eddie Redmayne once played the first transgender woman.
And now it is justified that he did it.
Because it is appropriation.
And only a transgender woman herself should have played such a woman.
Otherwise it comes out unfair.
The International Olympic Committee has developed a set of rules for the participation of transgender athletes in world-class competitions.
According to these rules, each person is free to choose the category of competition that corresponds to his inner gender sense.
Moreover, if you are a woman, then one application is enough to participate in men's competitions.
But if you are a man, then in order to participate in women's competitions you need to be tested for testosterone levels.
This is happening right now.
So far, thank God, not in our country.
But this already concerns our athletes.
Who will be forced to speak next to these people here at the request.
Do not misunderstand me.
I am completely tolerant of people who feel they are not who they are by nature.
Each hut has its own rattles.
But when such people make other people dependent on their rattles, it causes, let's say, bewilderment.
And it's okay there are gender self-perceptions.
But it comes down to specifics.
The American court ordered the actor Kevin Spacey to pay $ 31 million to the authors of the series "House of Cards".
For the fact that the studio that filmed the series fired Kevin Spacey from this series.
Why did you fire her?
Because Kevin Spacey was charged with harassment, none of which has been proven in court.
That is, once again: the American court was unable to prove the fact of the harassment of Kevin Spacey.
And the American court ruled that Kevin Spacey owes him for being fired on unjust (unproven) charges.
I don't want to defend Kevin Spacey at all.
Maybe he's a bastard.
But nothing has been proven.
And it would be for him to roll out a lawsuit against the studio, which fired him without any reason.
But no, he should.
This is the new ethic.
And it is ethics (more precisely, what is considered ethics by the tweeters) that now begins to determine the universe.
Not here, of course, but there, but nobody canceled the diffusion of dope.
We already have ethical legions - that of feminists, that of the "Male State" *, that of anti-Axers.
And the question of their strengthening is a matter of time.
And, alas, this cannot be prevented.
One can only anticipate and prepare.
Find yourself a more conservative area.
Why, at least move to Chechnya.
These trans-infinite ones are scary.
* "Male state" - the association was recognized as extremist by the decision of the Nizhny Novgorod Regional Court dated 10/18/2021.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.