The unprecedented PlastiGar study, intended to measure plastic pollution in the Garonne, has just delivered its verdict.
Microplastics are more present around Toulouse and during low water periods.
One in ten fish sampled had eaten it.
At the sight of the immense plastic continents which pollute the oceans, we are more moved by the fate of whales or turtles than that of the studs and barbels of the Garonne. It is wrong. They too are entitled, well upstream, to a regrettable food diversification through sediments seasoned with microplastics. And, for the first time, researchers went fishing for information to quantify this "reality", from the foothills of the Pyrenees to Agen.
The PlastiGar study (for Plastique Garonne) occupied over the year 2019 a dozen ecologists and chemists from two Toulouse laboratories * of the CNRS. During four seasons, they threw their nets, wielded the landing net, to filter surface water, scraped in the mud to sieve the sediments, and caught fish to make them regurgitate their food bowl.
Their quest was for microplastics (mainly derived from the fragmentation of larger waste) ranging from 0.7 to 5 mm. She has just delivered her verdict. Unsurprisingly, this polluting waste floats or lies well in the Garonne, up to 25 per m2. "The values observed are of the same order as in the other large rivers in Western Europe," explains Julien Cucherousset, ecologist at the Evolution and Biological Diversity Laboratory (EDB-CNRS, Univ. Toulouse III). Urbanization plays an important role leading to an increase in concentrations ”. The peri-urban area and downstream of Toulouse are particularly affected. And the problem worsens in the summer when the flow decreases or during floods.
In terms of the colors of the tiny fragments, white (32.4%) and black (31.1%) dominate.
“Their composition is 90% that of polymers used more in packaging,” underlines Aline Reis de Carvalho, doctoral student in chemistry during the project.
Up to four pieces of plastic in a fish's stomach
Regarding the Garonne, "globally all the species studied had plastic," notes Julien Cucherousse.
But not all individuals.
Scientists focused on the outskirts of Toulouse where, according to their samples, 2% of invertebrates (insects and molluscs) and 10% of fish are contaminated.
This being an average.
"In the Hers [near Launaguet] the contamination of fish increases to 16%", specifies Aline Reis de Carvalho.
Each "plasticized" fish ate between one and four microplastics.
Among invertebrates, the most contaminated individuals are the rather large predators, such as dragonfly larvae and crayfish.
While in fish, it is the studs and barbel, which feed on the sediment, which ingest the most plastic.
"It is rather a direct and accidental consumption", notes Julien Coucherousset.
Not necessarily from food chain transmission.
These realities being posed, and while PlastiGar teams attempt to analyze even smaller microplastics, other studies must now address the consequences of this pollution and other impacts of human activities on ecosystems.
* The Evolution and Biological Diversity laboratories (EDB - CNRS, Toulouse III University - Paul Sabatier, IRD) and Molecular Interactions and Chemical and Photochemical Reactivity (IMRCP - CNRS, Toulouse III University - Paul Sabatier)
Toulouse
Toulouse: Finally a study on the impact of plastic pollution on rivers and fish
Planet
Mediterranean: the plague of plastic soon tracked down from space
Fish
Animals
Garonne
Research
Toulouse
Pollution
Planet
0 comment
0 share
Share on Messenger
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Flipboard
Share on Pinterest
Share on Linkedin
Send by Mail
To safeguard
A fault ?
To print