China News Service, October 14th. According to the WeChat official account of the Aba Intermediate People’s Court, on October 14, 2021, the Intermediate People’s Court of the Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan Province conducted a public trial on the case of the defendant Tang Lu’s intentional homicide. The court pronounced that the defendant Tang Lu was guilty of intentional homicide, sentenced to death, deprived of political rights for life, and compensated for the material losses caused to the plaintiff in the attached civil lawsuit due to the criminal act.
The People's Procuratorate of Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture sent officers to appear in court to support the public prosecution. The defendant Tang Lu and his defender, the plaintiff in the incidental civil lawsuit and his agent ad litem appeared in court to participate in the litigation.
Image source: WeChat public account of the Intermediate People's Court of Aba Prefecture
The court found that the defendant Tang Lu and the victim Amuchu (the vibrato name: Black Girl [Ram]) registered their marriage in 2009. After marriage, the two often quarreled over family matters. Tang Lu beat Amuchu many times. , The two divorced on June 28, 2020.
Houtanglu repeatedly sought Amuchu's remarriage and was rejected, so resentment grew in his heart.
At about 20:30 on September 14, 2020, Tang Lu went to Amuchu's father's house, poured gasoline on Amuchu who was live broadcast in the kitchen and set fire to him, causing Amuchu to burn.
Amuchu died after half a month after treatment failed.
Tang Lu was arrested after escaping the scene.
After trial, the court found that the defendant Tang Lu’s act of causing Amuchu’s death constituted the crime of intentional homicide, and that the criminal methods were extremely cruel, the social impact was extremely bad, and the crime was extremely serious, and the sentence should be severely punished in accordance with the law.
Due to the major complexity of the case, the court formed a seven-person collegiate panel to hear the case.
During the trial, the public prosecution agency produced relevant evidence. The defendant Tang Lu and his defender cross-examined the evidence. Both the prosecution and the defendant, the plaintiff in the incidental civil lawsuit and his agent ad litem fully expressed their opinions under the auspices of the court, and the defendant Tang Lu also Made a final statement.
The litigation rights of the defendant and his defender, the plaintiff in the incidental civil lawsuit and his agent ad litem have been fully protected.
Relatives of the defendant, relatives of the victim, deputies to the National People's Congress, members of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, experts and scholars, media reporters and some people attended the trial.