Hangzhou: Lin Shengbin was not found to be involved in the arson case
Relevant departments have launched investigations in response to netizens questioning and reporting their tax evasion, tax evasion, fraud, etc.
On August 3, the Hangzhou Joint Investigation Team released the investigation results of the Lin Shengbin incident. The investigation did not find that Lin Shengbin participated in the planning and implementation of the nanny arson case.
For some netizens who questioned and reported "Lin Shengbin suspected of tax evasion, suspected of illegal public fundraising, fraudulent donations" and other situations, relevant departments have conducted serious investigations in accordance with procedures, and if there are indeed violations of laws and regulations, they will be dealt with seriously in accordance with laws and regulations.
The investigation did not find the fact that Lin Shengbin participated in the arson case
On June 30, Lin Shengbin, the family member of the victim of the "Hangzhou nanny arson case", issued a document saying that he was remarried and gave birth to a daughter. Since then, netizens have raised questions about the distribution of civil compensation in the Lin Shengbin arson case, online store charity donations, and the establishment of a foundation.
Since then, "Lin Shengbin is related to the arson nanny" and "Lin Shengbin has another 4-year-old son" have been circulating on the Internet.
On August 3, the Hangzhou Joint Investigation Team reported the relevant situation, saying that the Hangzhou Joint Investigation Team conducted investigation and verification in response to the recent online reports of Lin Shengbin’s suspected crimes.
The report stated that the arson case has been investigated, prosecuted, and tried in accordance with the law, and submitted to the Supreme People's Court for approval, and the evidence is conclusive.
The criminal Mo Huanjing was sentenced to death and executed.
The public security organs carried out a comprehensive and detailed investigation and evidence collection of the case in strict accordance with the relevant legal procedures, and found no facts that Lin Shengbin participated in the planning and implementation of the case.
There are rumors that Lin has another 4-year-old son on the Internet
Regarding the online part of the statement, after investigation, it was reported that "Lin Shengbin has an abnormal relationship with Mo Huanjing", "Mo Huanjing is really related to Ren Mou, and Mo Huanjing introduced Ren Mouzhen to work as a nanny at Zhu Mouzhen's house" and "Lin Shengbin" On the night of the incident, there were three firefighters near the scene ""Lin Shengbin, Lin Shengbin's brother-in-law, and Mo Huanjing son were three firefighters at the scene", "Lin Shengbin has another 4-year-old son" and "Lin Shengbin's brother Lin Moufeng is a prisoner who has served his sentence." When the arson case happened, Mr. Yang, the security guard of Greentown Property, was the true brother-in-law of Mr. Ren,” and “Lin Shengbin used to purchase a large amount of personal accident insurance for Zhu Mozhen and his children with his beneficiary”.
At present, the public security organs have launched investigations in accordance with the law on the violations of public order management by Internet users Huang Moumou in Jiaozhou, Shandong.
For some netizens who questioned and reported "Lin Shengbin suspected of tax evasion, suspected of illegal public fundraising, fraudulent donations" and other situations, relevant departments have conducted serious investigations in accordance with procedures, and if there are indeed violations of laws and regulations, they will be dealt with seriously in accordance with laws and regulations.
The joint investigation team stated that cyberspace is not a place outside the law.
Netizens are requested to use the Internet in a civilized and rational manner in accordance with the law, and consciously do not spread rumors, believe in rumors, or spread rumors. Do not forward or fabricate unverified information at will.
For those who deliberately create or spread rumors, the public security organs will severely deal with them in accordance with the law.
News memory
At 5 a.m. on June 22, 2017, an arson incident occurred in Room 1802, Unit 1, Building 2, Blue Qianjiang Community, Hangzhou. The incident caused the death of the hostess Zhu Xiaozhen and three minor children.
On July 1, 2017, in accordance with the Hangzhou Municipal People’s Procuratorate’s decision to approve the arrest, the Hangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau arrested Mo Huanjing, the suspect suspected of arson and theft.
On August 21, 2017, the Hangzhou City Procuratorate filed a public prosecution against defendant Mo Huanjing in accordance with the law.
After the first instance and the second instance, the defendant Mo Huanjing was sentenced to death and executed on September 21, 2018.
In addition to the criminal case, Lin Shengbin, the victim’s family member, filed a civil lawsuit for a right to life dispute, claiming 130 million yuan from 9 departments including the defendant Greentown Property Company, development, construction, supervision and fire protection departments.
On April 2, 2019, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court notified that after the court presided over the mediation, the plaintiffs Lin Shengbin, Zhu Hengren, Xu Muzhi and the defendant Greentown Property have reached a mediation agreement on the dispute in this case, and Greentown Property has fully fulfilled the obligations determined by the mediation agreement. .
On June 30 this year, Lin Shengbin issued an article saying that he had remarried and gave birth to a daughter, but Zhu Xiaozhen's brother later questioned that he was unfair to his father-in-law during the distribution of the estate.
On July 8, Lin Shengbin posted a number of Weibo posts in response to doubts.
Regarding the compensation for fire civil litigation, Lin Shengbin stated that 67% of the compensation was used to repay the loan of the fire house, the bank loan of the 16-year company, the funeral of the deceased and the cemetery expenses, etc., and the remaining 33% was reserved for his father-in-law and his mother-in-law. Porsche at home as a gift to his father-in-law.
As for the other properties and fired houses of his wife Zhu Xiaozhen during his lifetime, no notarization, withdrawal or transfer of ownership has been carried out so far.
Regarding the preparation of the foundation, on July 9th, Lin Shengbin's attorney replied that Lin Shengbin had not indicated to him that he would donate to the foundation the compensation for personal damage that he might receive in the future.
After the civil part of the case was closed, Lin Shengbin consulted him several times on preparing for the establishment of the foundation, but due to "objectively it is quite difficult, he did not achieve his wish."
This group of articles / our reporter Zhang Yuemeng coordinated / Jiang Shuo