Be afraid of your desires.

It is this phrase that the Security Service of Ukraine should cast in granite and place over the entrance to its headquarters.

At least in order to think hard before voicing your next anecdotal decision.

Including the possible consequences.

So, yesterday morning began not with coffee, but with the news that the SBU had “summoned” Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu to conduct investigative actions and bring charges against him.

Of course, social networks immediately reacted to this with a decent portion of humor, painting in paints the details of Shoigu's “appearance” in Mariupol.

However, no matter how absurd the Ukrainian “invitation” may seem, there is still a chance that it will be accepted.

However, if Sergei Kuzhugetovich goes to Ukraine, it will not be for "sincere" conversations. 

The fact is that some particularly violent Ukrainian heads, from the former head of the National Security and Defense Council Turchynov and ending with not quite adequate "military experts", periodically raise the question of the need to create a "dirty bomb".

For overcoming Russia, of course.

Taking into account the rate of degradation of the Ukrainian statehood and the throwing of the authorities of this country, with which they do not want to mess with anywhere else, it is impossible to unambiguously discount the likelihood of creating such a weapon.

Moreover, Ukraine has the potential for this.

But there is a nuance.

Namely: if a neighboring country still tries to use this very "dirty bomb", then this day will be the last in the history of its existence.

In short, the use of a "dirty" nuclear bomb can lead to radiation contamination of soil, water, and foci of radiation sickness in large areas.

In essence, this is nuclear terrorism.

The scale of the consequences of which can be compared with the explosion at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.

I don’t think that the same Europe likes the prospect, as in 1986, of again keeping an eye on the wind rose and, as a bonus, also getting a charge of sponsoring terrorism.

After all, it has not properly reacted to any of the statements on this topic made by the representatives of Ukraine.

Therefore, if at least some hints appear that Ukraine has such a "weapon", the Russian army will still appear, but not to testify.

And believe me, none of the current curators and sponsors of Ukraine will object.

Because, being of sane mind, no Western politician will cover and support those who created and used the "dirty bomb".

For no one needs a precedent that other "fighters for all good against all bad" will be able to use with passion.

Moreover!

The solution of the Ukrainian question with great joy and a noisy sigh of relief will be given to Russia.

Because it so happened historically that it is the Russians who have to pacify the demons that arose with the complete connivance of the West.

So the visit of a delegation of the Russian military department to Ukraine does not seem so incredible.

And if some hotheads continue to speculate with threats and, God forbid, move from words to some concrete actions, then in this case Shoigu's visit to Ukraine will indeed take place.

But not only everyone will like its consequences.

By the way, the same people who regularly raise the topic of the "dirty bomb", for the most part, are also fans of Dzhokhar Dudayev. Which at one time (just a coincidence, yes) also tried to intimidate Russia in this way. How the Chechen terrorist ended is a well-known fact. Which, apparently, still needs to be periodically reminded. The same Security Service of Ukraine. Which, instead of regularly exposing itself to ridicule, it would be better to closely monitor the situation inside the country. After all, if this very bomb is made, the first and main victims of its use will be Ukraine and the Ukrainians.

Who, finding themselves face to face with the devastating consequences of the activities of maddened fanatics, will beg to be saved.

And not just anyone, namely the Russians.

Led by the one whose name is now on this stupid agenda, which so amused many, but which in the event of an unfavorable development of the situation may turn out to be prophetic.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.