The "Multi-School Division" in West City is a good example of cracking the "School District Housing"

  ■ Editorial

  Lifting the "close binding" between the prestigious schools and neighboring houses, and reducing the fever of the "school district housing fever", can eliminate the "school district housing fever" in the workshops.

  Recently, Xicheng District, Beijing, completed the registration of intent to enroll in multiple schools this year.

Some parents found that their houses no longer have a multi-school demarcation plan for the enrolled school, and even all schools in the school district do not have a multi-school demarcation plan, so they can only report to neighboring school district schools.

  In fact, as early as last year, the Xicheng District Education Commission issued a document clarifying that after July 31, 2020, families who bought houses would no longer register to enroll in the designated schools, and all enroll in the school district or adjacent school districts in a multi-school manner.

This time aroused concern, and also confirmed that the "boots" officially landed.

  Over the years, the news that houses around Niu School have been fired at "high prices" have made the topic of "school district housing" a "high fever".

Many parents desperately rely on prestigious schools to buy "school district housing", so the increased investment in education has overwhelmed their families.

Some real estate speculators are also aiming at the upside brought by the imbalance between supply and demand, and speculate on those "aisle houses" and "old broken and small" at high prices, allowing these houses to obtain a premium far exceeding their residential value, seriously deviating from the policy of "housing to live without speculation". Set the tone.

  Under this situation, cooling down the "school district housing fever" has become the common expectation of the people.

It can be said that the continuous increase in the price of "school district housing" is an injury to the fairness of education, a continuous stimulus to social anxiety, and it is contrary to the regulatory policies.

Only by lifting the "close binding" between famous schools and neighboring houses and reducing the fever for "school district housing fever" can the "school district housing fanaticism" be eliminated.

  At this time, the action in Xicheng District, Beijing, can be described as a targeted effort to eliminate malaria: matching high-quality schools with ordinary schools and cutting off the multi-school plan that links the "school district room" with the direct-to-high-quality schools. The film can be called the “school district housing fever” to reduce the fever from the bottom of the pan.

When buying a "school district house" no longer guarantees that children will enter the "niuxiao", and if you don't buy it, there is also the possibility of being assigned to a cow school. The hype surrounding the "school district house" naturally loses the "core drive".

From this point of view, Xicheng District’s move is tantamount to pouring cold water on the “school district housing fever” and a fundamental negation of the “school district housing” investment logic of “one radish and one pit”.

  The overall quality of education in Xicheng District has always been recognized, and the Desheng area is home to top schools.

Xicheng District’s “school district housing fever” is undoubtedly in line with the demands of people’s livelihood: regardless of the central government’s requirement to "prevent housing speculation in the name of school district housing," or based on the real social needs of education fairness, this is problem-oriented. Scientific decision-making is a positive move to take advantage of the trend.

The use of limited degrees and random allocation of school district resources to re-allocate resources to cool down the "school district housing fever" essentially reflects the important orientation of the current school district reform.

  At a deeper level, the big move of Xicheng District this time is also sending a kind of vane-like signal.

On April 30 this year, the Politburo meeting called for "preventing housing speculation in the name of school district housing". This is the first time that the central decision-making has targeted "school district housing" since the housing commercialization reform in 1998.

  Since then, many domestic "school district housing" regulation has accelerated, and "school district housing" hype and rectification have increased. For more than two months, Guangzhou, Chengdu, Shijiazhuang, Nanjing and other places have launched actions to control false and illegal advertisements in the real estate field. Among them, illegal publicity and speculation of housing prices in the name of "school district housing" have become the focus of rectification.

For society, including parents, it is clear that we should also see the trend behind the policy, eliminate the existing "school district housing complex", and change the irrational expectation of "building a house to go to school".

  In fact, the “school district housing boom” and the implementation of “strict supervision” on online education platforms, as a parallel measure to reduce the burden on family education, clearly demonstrate the basic orientation of education-related regulatory policies: to improve the balance of educational resources and reduce the amount of internal education. Volume will be an irreversible trend.

  Advancing education equity requires systematic efforts, and such measures are combined with more measures to expand the radiation coverage of high-quality education resources-such as vertical "nine-year consistency", allocation of key high school indicators to weak junior high schools, and horizontal " "Alliance, continuity, and belt" encourage the formation of high-quality resource belts, and add to education fairness as a whole.

  In short, to reduce the fever of the "school district housing fever" is also to "dispel the fire" for social education anxiety and housing anxiety.

Only by letting the "school district housing" cease to be "hot" can the sense of people's livelihood in the educational dimension be stronger.

The bones have to dare to gnaw hard, it is not difficult to foresee, so that the action of moving really hard to gnaw the bones can also trigger a demonstration effect.