On the front page: Napoleon, we love him or we hate him

Audio 04:07

Two hundred years after the death of Napoleon Bonaparte, its commemoration is debated in France.

© REUTERS - Sarah Meyssonnier

By: Frédéric Couteau Follow

9 mins

Publicity

On May 5, 1821, Napoleon died in Saint Helena, after six years of exile and after a meteoric rise and fall just as meteoric.

Two hundred years later, should we commemorate his death and how?

Because, “ 

the character is divisive,

underlines

Ouest France.

He has his worshipers and his slayers.

Everyone has their representation of Napoleon.

 "

So, " 

Emmanuel Macron seeks the right tone to commemorate Napoleon

 ", points

Le Figaro

on the front page.

“ 

The speech that the Head of State is due to deliver today for the bicentenary of the Emperor's death is eagerly awaited.

He does not want to fall "neither into hagiography nor into repentance".

"To commemorate is not to celebrate", we assure you at the Élysée.

 "

A great figure in our history?

However, believes

Le Figaro

, “ 

the victorious general, the First Consul, the Emperor, is part of the history of France, and in what way!

Just think of what was the life of this little Corsican officer who became the master of Europe through his military genius, his energy and his daring.

Civil Code, Council of State, Legion of Honor, high school, gendarmerie…, France's debt to it is immense,

exclaims

Le Figaro.

Has he committed any crimes?

Alas, slavery is one of them, like the death of the Duc d'Enghien, useless and brutal.

Mistakes, mistakes?

Surely.

Is it for this,

wonders the newspaper,

that it should be thrown into darkness, in the light of the only contemporary canons of "anti-racism" and "feminism"?

 "

And

Le Figaro

concludes: “ 

Along with Joan of Arc, de Gaulle, Napoleon is one of our universally known figures. If in Paris beautiful souls are moved, the whole world remains fascinated by this destiny. We must therefore commemorate it, yes, celebrate it, of course. This does not prevent the critical work of historians.

 "

Like the great nation that it is, France cannot turn its back on its history and on one of its most illustrious representatives,

 " adds

La Dépêche du Midi.

“ 

The taller a man is, the more his dark side is.

And it would be dangerous if not absurd,

considers the newspaper

, to erase from the collective memory of the acts committed two hundred years earlier, were they radically contrary to our current republican principles.

 "

A dictator who left France bloodless?

Conversely,

L'Humanité

denounces " 

the poison of Bonapartism

 ": this is its headline.

By commemorating this Wednesday the death of the" little corporal ", Emmanuel Macron seeks to take advantage of the mythical figure of the Emperor.

 "And the Communist daily recalled that" 

Napoleon was not only the author of the coup d'état of 18 Brumaire, which put an end to the French Revolution, but also the one who reestablished slavery in the colonies in 1802, marking France with iron for future generations.

(…) Its dictatorship was a military dictatorship, therefore absolute,

further points out

L'Huma: conquer, administer, monitor, punish, muzzle the press.

After the great revolutionary overthrow which enlightened the Enlightenment and the world, he left France bloodless, ready to offer itself again to all the oligarchies.

 "

Mad about Napoleon!

In any case, Napoleon left an indelible mark in the imagination of the French.

And some have even sunk into an “ 

acute napoleonite

 ”: this is what the daily

Le Monde

notes

, with this at least original angle: Napoleon and the fools. 

Indeed, points out the evening daily, “ 

the figure of the emperor has become, over time, a popular avatar of the illuminated.

 "It's true," 

who has never heard that all crazy people think they are Napoleon?

This archetype has survived the ages.

The Emperor does better than Jesus, Joan of Arc or Louis XIV,

still notes

Le Monde: "he is by far the most popular delirious figure," confirms historian Laure Murat.

(…) And if the enlightened ones chose him so much as an avatar, she insists, "it is because before being Napoleon, he was Bonaparte, a small captain without dynastic legitimacy who reached the highest step of the power when he was not an heir of royal blood. Thanks to him, any ambitious can allow himself to dream of an extraordinary destiny ".

The almighty general personifies megalomania.

 "

And finally, concludes

Le Monde, “

the profiles of imperial madmen are alike: they are authoritarian, angry, capricious, invulnerable and fix their eyes on an inevitably glorious horizon.

In short, they challenge the gods.

 "

Newsletter

Receive all international news directly in your mailbox

I subscribe

Follow all the international news by downloading the RFI application

google-play-badge_FR

  • Napoleon

  • French politics

  • History

  • Newspaper

On the same subject

Napoleon, for better or for worse, still unleashes passions 200 years after his death