CCTV News, Changsha, April 19 According to the "News Have Opinions" report of the Voice of China Central Radio and Television, on April 18, the Hunan Provincial Personnel Examination Institute announced the violation of discipline in the 2021 provincial examination.

The notification list showed that 73 candidates were living in general violations of discipline and regulations, specifically continuing to answer questions after the exam, taking the exam papers out of the exam room, etc., and 10 candidates’ answer papers were recognized by professional institutions as similar in answer papers (5 pairs of two identical).

At present, 83 candidates have been made invalid for their examination results, which has caused heated discussions among netizens.

Over the years, the routine operation of publicizing violations has become a hot topic, which surprised the Hunan Provincial Personnel Examination Institute.

Hunan Personnel Examination Institute: The identification and handling of violations of discipline are in compliance, and the centralized announcement is to warn candidates of "honesty reference and law-abiding reference"

　　Faced with the extensive discussion caused by this announcement, Ma Jinliang, the dean of the Hunan Provincial Personnel Examination Institute, said in an interview with China Voice "News Have Views" that this violation of discipline is strictly in accordance with the national "Civil Service Examination Recruitment Violation of Discipline and Regulations." In accordance with the relevant provisions of the "Announcement on the Recruitment of Civil Servants in Hunan Province in 2021", the province's violation rate was five out of ten thousand. The hot discussion may be caused by the shock caused by the "centralized announcement."

"This time we will collectively announce the violations in the province, and we also want to have a reminder for future candidates, honesty and law-abiding."

　　In this disciplinary notice, 10 candidates were identified as having the same answer sheet, and 5 of them were identical in pairs.

In response to the question of "whether resemblance equals cheating", Ma Jinliang explained that in accordance with relevant regulations, all test takers' answer sheets need to be tested for the same.

Similarity testing refers to entrusting a third-party professional testing agency with national qualifications to perform technical similarity testing on candidates’ answer information.

After detecting the same test paper, the surveillance video of the test site will also be retrieved for further verification.

Ma Jinliang said: “This year we have also verified 5 pairs of candidates. They are distributed in 5 different examination areas and examination rooms. They are all plagiarizing the answers of candidates from nearby seats on the spot. We also deal with it in accordance with the law and regulations.” In accordance with the regulations, submit the same answer sheet. Of candidates (including plagiarism and plagiarism) have to cancel their scores.

　　Ma Jinliang said that all violations of discipline and regulations were found in the examination, and the results of the subjects were invalidated.

He said: "(Disciplinary candidates) mainly lack the seriousness of the examination discipline and have a fluke mentality." If there are serious violations and particularly serious violations, they will be subject to five-year restriction on registration and lifetime restriction on registration respectively. .

What's more, those suspected of illegal crimes will be transferred to the judicial department for handling in accordance with the law.

Experts in the field of teaching and examination: notification of violations of discipline is worthy of encouragement, and civil servants need to comprehensively consider whether they are "appropriate" when applying for the examination

　　The annual report on violations of civil service exam disciplines will cause some netizens to worry about the fairness of the exam. Chen Zhiwen, the editor-in-chief of China Education Online, said to "News Have Views" that cheating will occur if there is an exam. "Cheating can be controlled to the greatest extent, but not It does not mean that it can be eliminated." Chen Zhiwen said that the notification of examination violations is a timely, open and transparent treatment, which is a deterrent in itself and should be encouraged.

　　Regarding the doubts about whether the civil service examination training is useful, Chen Zhiwen pointed out that the civil service examination is "very open", not only examines the examinee's learning ability, that is, "does it understand", but also examines the examinee's expressive ability.

Chen Zhiwen believes that “training is objectively effective”, and the value of training cannot be denied, but the value of training cannot be magnified either.

He said: "If the ability is not strong enough, the basic training is poor, especially if the logic is poor, retraining is useless."

　　Chen Zhiwen also reminded that due to factors such as employment pressure, income stability, and parental expectations, the "public examination fever" is understandable, but candidates should also rationally consider whether they are suitable for civil servants.

This consideration is mainly a judgment of personality, not ability.

"If you enter this team with the goal of realizing the value of life, you may really be able to do something." Chen Zhiwen said.

Legal experts: The public pays more attention to the fairness of examinations, and there are traces to follow, and the national examination system needs to keep pace with the times

　　Wu Shenkuo, executive director and doctoral supervisor of the International Center for Internet Rule of Law, Beijing Normal University, and deputy director of the Research Center of the Internet Society of China, believes that the public’s focus on violations of public examinations this year is based on the “deep social background” of the country’s efforts to strengthen anti-corruption, clean government and procuratorial work. produced.

With the continuous improvement of the legal environment and the awakening of the people's self-awareness, the people's expectations are constantly rising.

　　Wu Shenkuo said that my country's law has relatively clear penalties for cheating in national examinations.

However, the development of high and new technology has brought about the rapid update of cheating methods. At present, there are more factors to consider, and the process mechanism of national examinations also needs to be continuously improved.

　　Producer: Bai Zhonghua

　　Reporter: Yang Chang

　　Editor: Liu Hongwei Zhu Yunzhou