On the 19th, the Okayama Prefectural Assembly passed a written opinion against the introduction of selective married couple surnames with a majority in favor.
It is the first time that a prefectural assembly has passed a written opinion against selective married couples' surnames since 2010, more than 10 years ago.
Regarding the selective surname of a married couple who can give their surname before marriage if they wish, it was stated in the "Gender Equality Basic Plan" decided by the Cabinet last year that "further consideration will be made", and discussions proceed while there are pros and cons. It has been done.
At the main meeting of the Okayama Prefectural Assembly held on the 19th, a draft opinion was submitted against the introduction of selective surnames for married couples based on petition from conservative groups in the prefecture.
Among them, "The married couple surname system may jeopardize the bond and sense of unity of the family, and there is a strong concern that giving different surnames to parents and children will have an adverse effect on the welfare of children." I'm pointing out.
In response, the opposition lawmakers commented that they "go against the trend of gender equality" and "should not be submitted as the consensus of the prefectural assembly."
After that, a vote was taken and the written opinion was passed by a majority.
According to the National Association of Chairpersons of the Prefectural Assembly, a written opinion against selective surnames for married couples was passed in 20 prefectures nationwide in 2010, 11 years ago, but this is the first time since then.
The Okayama Prefectural Assembly will submit a written opinion to Prime Minister Suga and Minister of Justice Kamikawa by the end of this month.