Within the walls of the Ukrainian parliament, a bill on punishment for collaboration is being considered.
And very interesting people can become its victims.
The Ukrainian authorities continue to build on the remnants of their country a real liberal-democratic state with "Maidan specifics".
That is, according to the principle "one Reich - one herd - one ideology."
They have already banned opposition channels, dispersed opposition parties (the main of which, the Opposition Platform - For Life, almost caught up with the ruling Servant of the People's rating).
The property of the main political opponent of the current government, the oligarch Viktor Medvedchuk, was arrested.
Now it was the turn to reeducate ordinary people.
So, the ruling "Servants" submitted to the Verkhovna Rada a bill on the establishment of criminal liability for collaboration activities.
It is understood, for example, a public denial by a citizen of Ukraine of the implementation of armed aggression against Ukraine, as well as a number of actions describing various kinds of relationships with the “aggressor state”.
The initiative was actively supported by Ukrainian Nazis.
“It is thanks to this bill that we will really be able to bring to justice all those villains who collaborated or are cooperating with the enemy,” rejoices the head of the National Corps headquarters (banned in Russia) Maxim Zhorin.
And they can be understood: the principle declared in Ukraine “one territory - one leaps - one anarchy” fully correlates with the formulas of their ideological fathers.
Russian experts, of course, will criticize the draft law on collaboration, even talk about why the European Union does not pay attention to this demonstrative violation of human rights.
Meanwhile, the Donbass dimension of the bill is, in fact, sanctions against residents of the DPR and LPR, who now live and work on the territory of the self-proclaimed republics.
They are simply amazed at their rights and say that in the event of the reintegration of Donbass into Ukraine, all its residents will automatically sit down or be fined.
Ukrainian Nazis sincerely believe that they did the right thing, but Moscow can get a number of advantages here.
Firstly, the bill directly violates the Minsk Agreements (where the amnesty is written to Ukrainians on paper).
And the point here is not even that Ukraine has created for itself one more stopper for the reintegration of the republics.
In fact, the bill has become another argument in the Russian treasury of numerous violations of the conditions of "Minsk" by Kiev.
A piggy bank that Moscow will break at the right time, that is, when it will justify (we are polite people, we always argue our actions) the need to increase the territory of the Russian Federation at the expense of two new regions - Donetsk and Lugansk.
Secondly, this is another reminder to those few residents of the DPR and LPR, who are confident in Kiev's readiness to accept them back with open arms, that Ukraine is ready to accept them only in prison.
However, the Ukrainian dimension of the bill is much more important for Russia.
The local Nazis and the Servant of the People who grunt at them from among the deputies sincerely believe that the bill will close their mouths to all ordinary people who do not agree with the general line of the Ukrainian neporikh.
All those who are dissatisfied with the socio-economic situation, who associate it not with “Russian aggression”, but with the coup d'état that took place in the country in 2014, the civil war and the transition of Ukraine under external control.
Anyone who says that Crimea cannot be returned and that Donbass should be dealt with.
However, chips from such a felling of the opposition forest can fly in completely unpredictable directions.
For example, what about the collaborators from Naftogaz, who maintain economic relations with the “aggressor country”?
And it's not even about the purchase of Russian gas - it is allegedly bought in Europe when it already becomes European, but about transit.
And this is pure “cooperation with the aggressor state”.
What about the collaborationists from among the Ukrainian diplomats working in the contact group within the framework of the Minsk process?
After all, they are negotiating with the "aggressor state", sitting at the same table with it, which means they recognize its subjectivity in matters that seem to be exclusively internal Ukrainian.
What about the president and parliament of Ukraine, which formally support the Minsk agreements?
After all, these agreements are, in fact, the quintessence of the “aggressor's” plans to federalize Ukraine.
They spell out the conditions for the reintegration of the LPR and DPR, which will limit Kiev's sovereignty over this territory.
What about Ukrainian "political scientists" and political scientists who come to participate in Russian talk shows or communicate with viewers via video communication?
They are actually conducting informational cooperation with the “aggressor state”.
Sometimes not on a charitable basis.
Finally, what about people who, under this law, can sit down for comments that are far from the topic of Donbass?
The wording “support for the decisions and / or actions of the aggressor state” means that a Ukrainian will be subject to the law if, for example, he supports the actions of the Russian Armed Forces against terrorists in Syria.
Or the proposal of Vladimir Putin to give Ukraine a vaccine against coronavirus.
And in order not to fall under the law, a law-abiding citizen must support the cutting off of the heads of the unbelievers and advocate that the "crown" should destroy as many of his compatriots as possible.
Marasmus?
No, modern Ukrainian realities.
The more vivid they are, the faster the Ukrainian population will take off the blinders, shudder from the charm of post-Maidan life and turn back.
Therefore, the Russians should applaud the current legislative initiative of the Ukrainian parliamentarians, and then ask for an encore.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.