PREMIUM

  • LUIS MARTÍNEZ

    Madrid

Tuesday, February 16, 2021 - 16:03

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on Twitter

  • Send by email

How much of what appears in

'Allen v.

Farrow '

did we already know?

How much of what was narrated did we not know and yet we thought we knew?

How much is completely new and, therefore, radically modifies our appreciation of the facts as an action associated with a trial, if you will, of an ethical nature or, if necessary and if there is a difference, aesthetic?

And, one more: How will we continue to watch Woody Allen's films from now on without the slightest hint of guilt?

Kirb's documentary

Become Premium and


enjoy 3 months for € 1

Take advantage of this limited time offer and access all web content

I love you

Are you already Premium?

Log in

Cancel whenever you want

Check the terms and conditions of the service

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more