PREMIUM
LUIS MARTÍNEZ
Madrid
Tuesday, February 16, 2021 - 16:03
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Send by email
How much of what appears in
'Allen v.
Farrow '
did we already know?
How much of what was narrated did we not know and yet we thought we knew?
How much is completely new and, therefore, radically modifies our appreciation of the facts as an action associated with a trial, if you will, of an ethical nature or, if necessary and if there is a difference, aesthetic?
And, one more: How will we continue to watch Woody Allen's films from now on without the slightest hint of guilt?
Kirb's documentary
Become Premium and
enjoy 3 months for € 1
Take advantage of this limited time offer and access all web content
I love you
Are you already Premium?
Log in
Cancel whenever you want
Check the terms and conditions of the service
According to the criteria of The Trust Project
Know more