- It is good that they are released, but the most important thing is that journalists do not have their own laws but are subject to the same laws as everyone else.
Then you can sometimes think that it is justifiable to break the law because a review is so important.
But then you have to be transparent and prepared to stand your ground and argue for your case in court, says Janne Josefsson.
He stands by his previous criticism of the documentary series, which he described as a "nicely produced conspiracy theory" in Dagens Nyheter.
The chairwoman of the Swedish Journalists' Association, Ulrika Hyllert, is very positive that men are free.
- I feel very relieved, the verdict is very welcome, she says.
"Seriously that journalists who have done their job are prosecuted"
The Swedish Journalists' Association has always been critical of the indictment against journalist Henrik Evertsson and wreck expert Linus Andersson.
- We think it is very serious that journalists who have done their job are prosecuted at all when it comes to a major public interest, says Ulrika Hyllert.
The verdict states that the two men are released because the court judges that international law weighs heavier than the national Estonian law which prohibits underwater activities.
- If the district court had judged that the Estonia Act was applicable, we assume that they would have been acquitted precisely because of their purpose when they did the investigation and the great public interest that exists, says Ulrika Hyllert.
Hear Ulrika Hyllert's reasoning in the video.