I understand the young people who came out to protest last Saturday, and I don't blame them at all.

It is foolish to blame the children.

And I still remember very well what it is like to be a child, want to be independent and seem like an adult.

Yes, even it would be okay, young people did not go to the rallies because they wanted to achieve something, to fight for something.

She left because she was waiting for some movement.

They were promised action, fun.

What kind of overthrow of the regime and concerns about the fate of the country?

The schoolchildren wanted to play adult games.

But just the adults who first campaigned in youth social networks, summoning teenagers to the streets, then let them go there (I'm talking about their parents), and then used them as “human shields” - you need to condemn and judge.

And after all, all this was done in the formats of the next challenge: "Come out, show what you are capable of, what are you, a coward, what are you, not like everyone else ?!"

Big trouble, really.

Sociologists have long been saying that new generations do not see the difference between opinion and fact.

For them, everything that is written on the Internet has the right to be and can be considered true.

And after all, it is clear that the agitation was done in a hurry, in haste.

Oppositionists and protest organizers needed to quickly gather people.

Who else, if not shkolota, is as easy going, who has no family, work and worries?

Nobody and nobody.

Who does it first, quickly, impulsively, on emotions, and then thinks?

Children.

This is what they played on.

And what we saw: young boys and girls in funny trousers, with colored hair and piercings, in jackets with anime characters ... Such grown-up children, such small adults.

I am deeply convinced that only infantiles and emotionally, intellectually and culturally immature people are interested in protests in this format, in the format of a goofy crush.

Therefore, children, who will still learn a lot in the future, are kind of predictable there (it is not surprising that they were led to all this), although it is completely unnecessary.

But I can only sympathize with adults who, on a par with them, also ineffectively jump between barriers and hang on lanterns.

You continue to passively sit on your ass straight and wait for someone else to come and save you, put you in order.

And this is instead of changing something ourselves.

So that such a horror with the participation of young people at rallies does not happen again, we (all of us: both society and the authorities) need to turn to our children.

Only by returning a trusting, close parent-child relationship can we save children from brainwashing.

Children should not be afraid and ashamed to communicate openly with their parents, should not be afraid of being ridiculed or punished, they should have a person to whom they can turn with any question or advice.

And this is the only way, in this situation, it will be possible to teach the child critical thinking and tell how the world works.

Parents have a responsibility to regain children's trust not through fear and punishment.

For the word "authority" to stop being abusive, it is time for adults to think about how to restore trust in the eyes of children.

Because for now, a collective blogger-streamer-influencer who speaks the same language with them and takes them seriously is becoming ideal and understanding for them.

Note that there were no children of the "protest leaders" at the protests.

For example, where are Navalny's daughter and son?

And some have no children at all, like Yashin.

He got married only recently, grew bolder.

The oppositionists used other people's children as heated extras, cannon fodder, in order to brag about the number of participants in the rallies the next day, the average audience of which barely reached 18+, so that photographs of the bloody heads and faces of youngsters were scattered throughout the media.

Although it is still necessary to find out who fucked them up: provocateurs and the same protesters or stumbled themselves.

The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.