China News Service, Hefei, January 7 (Zhao Qiang, Mei Xuefeng, Li Lingyan) The reporter learned from the People’s Procuratorate of Anhui Province on the 7th that the Lu’an City People’s Procuratorate in Anhui Province filed a public prosecution on the afternoon of the same day. The former chairman and party secretary of the company (China Salt Industry Group Co., Ltd.) Mao Qingguo made a first-instance verdict in the case of accepting bribes and sentenced him to 15 years in prison for accepting bribes and a fine of RMB 6 million. The illegal proceeds shall be recovered according to law.
The judgment was made by online video.
Photo courtesy of the People's Procuratorate of Anhui Province
After the trial, it was found that the defendant Mao Qingguo used to serve as the manager of Jiangsu Salt Industry Company, the director of Jiangsu Salt Bureau, the deputy secretary of the party committee, the general manager, the chairman of the board, and the deputy general manager of China National Salt Company from 1997 to 2014. The convenience of the general manager, chairman of the board of directors, etc., for the relevant units and individuals to seek benefits in project cooperation, bond underwriting, job promotion and other matters. By 2019, Mao Qingguo, directly or through specific related parties, will illegally receive a total of property from others It is equivalent to more than 72.03 million yuan, 10,000 US dollars and 10,000 euros.
The court of first instance held that the defendant Mao Qingguo, as a national employee, used the convenience of his position to seek benefits for relevant units and individuals. His behavior constituted a crime of accepting bribes, and the amount of bribes was extremely large. The prosecutors accused Mao Qingguo of accepting bribes. The facts are clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient, and the charges are convicted and supported in accordance with the law.
In addition, more than 8.91 million yuan of dividends were not actually controlled by Mao Qing, which was an attempted crime and could be given a lighter punishment.
After Mao Qingguo arrived at the case, he truthfully confessed his crimes, pleaded guilty and repented, returned most of the stolen money, and gave him a lighter punishment in accordance with the law, so he made the above judgment.
The judgment was made by online video.
After the verdict was pronounced in the first instance, the defendant Mao Qingguo did not express in court whether to appeal.
(Finish)