A vacationer in the Black Forest A.A.

Navalny's distant homeland sent New Year's gifts. 

The first gift came from the UFSIN.

The Office for the Execution of Criminal Sentences noted that, according to the conclusion of the Charite Clinic, published in the Lancet magazine, the Berlin patient had completely recovered by 15 October.

But even after two and a half months from the date of full recovery, he is abroad without the proper permission of the authorities that control the execution of the suspended sentence.

This presupposes the adoption of “the measures provided for by Art.

190-4 of the Criminal Executive Code ".

Assuming an appeal to the court with a request to cancel the conditional sentence with its replacement for an unconditional period.

The second gift was presented to the vacationer by the Investigative Committee, initiating a case against him under Art.

159-4 ("Fraud on an especially large scale", the sanction is up to ten years in prison).

The IC reported that 588 million rubles were collected from individuals for the needs of the Anti-Corruption Fund, the Fifth Season of the Year Media Support Fund, the Fund for Organizing and Coordinating the Protection of Citizens 'Rights, the Fund for Legal Support of Citizens and the Fund for the Protection of Citizens' Rights. 

The funds were intended exclusively for the purposes of the funds, while, according to the IC, A.A.

Navalny spent 356 million rubles of this amount.

(= € 4 million, 60% of collected funds) for personal consumption: acquisition of property, material values ​​and payment of expenses (including holidays abroad).

Actually, the public has long wondered what kind of conditional punishment in which the convicted person does not embarrass himself in anything, as well as what kind of reliable scheme that allows the fighter-passion-bearer to drink the full cup of life.

Opinions were expressed that the fighter was an undercover agent provocateur, since the condescension of the authorities, turning a blind eye to all the amazing deeds of A.A.

Navalny was amazing.

But at the end of the outgoing year, the era of mercy seems to have ended, and the version about the agent provocateur may lose popularity.

Up to ten years - what kind of cover is there.

The vacationer was extremely embittered by the gifts from his beloved homeland, which is understandable - what is there to be happy about?

“They will try to put me in jail because I didn’t die on that plane, and then I was looking for my killers.

Before trying to kill me, I was not silent, and after that I will not.

Join me.

Russia should be free from occupying thieves and their henchmen in uniform. "

There is still a lot of wow-wow-wow, but the change in discourse is remarkable.

Before the obligatory motive was “I miss my homeland, my homeland”.

With a binding promise to return soon.

These promises are no more - as cut off. 

Of course, there will continue to be discussions about the return, but now they are connected with certain conditions. 

Or in the style of the Kiev resident Babchenko, intending to drive along Tverskaya in the Abrams tank, but for this it is necessary that the column of American tanks reach the center of Moscow intact.

Either in the spirit of Lenin, who overcame all borders and landed at the Finland station, or Ayatollah Khomeini, who flew from Paris to Tehran.

But in fact, in both cases, the king (shah) had already been overthrown.

Under the tsarist (shah) regime, a triumphal arrival would have been difficult. 

Therefore, the most probable variant of Prince Kurbsky or Prince Khodorkovsky - "Behind a safe sitting border, you bark like a dog from behind the fence."

But this option has the disadvantage that there are already quite a lot of exiled barons, intraspecific competition is strong, and besides, the frenzied barking is monotonous and boring.

The example of Khodorkovsky - and before him Berezovsky - is a guarantee.

Both managed to get bored, and why with A.A.

Will Navalny be different?

So we will celebrate the New Year merrily, merrily, and the future will be oblivion.

Is that enough for a modest pension.

The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.