'I want to know that' The culprit of the'Cafe hostess case' that killed the mistress of the so-kitchen?... Similarity'Attention'

Is the culprit in both cases the same criminal?

SBS'I want to know it' broadcast on the 26th tracked the US case,'Shoujo-bang female owner's murder,' under the subtitle of'A spray gun and bucket-Traces of a killer left in the water'.

The son of the victim of the'Lilac Cafe Mistress Murder Case' in Jeju in September 2006 asked the production crew for help. At that time, the criminal was arrested after 15 days of the incident, but doubts remain.

The culprit is currently arrested and living in prison for 15 years, but the victim's son, Dong-hyuk (pseudonym), kept showing up in his dream. And in a dream, he headed to the crematorium with his mother, and when he arrived there, he opened the trunk of the car and found the body of a woman he had never seen before. And this dream continued for a few days, and Dong-hyuk, who felt something uncomfortable, encountered a shocking fact while searching for an article about his mother's case.

22 days before the Lilac Cafe incident, the hostess of a pub was murdered in a small kitchen, a 10-minute drive from the cafe, and there were many very similarities between the two cases. Accordingly, the police at the time judged both cases as the actions of the same criminal.

However, 14 years after the incident, the murder of a female owner in a small kitchen still remains an unprecedented case, creating wonder.

And even though evidence was found everywhere that the scene of the murder of a cafe hostess was the scene of robbery of money and goods and a bizarre sex crime, Mr. Ko was sentenced to 15 years for murder only.

At the age of 18, Ko, who had a number of criminal histories, including theft, his first crime, was sentenced to 15 years for only murder at the time.

He worked as a taxi driver at the time, but he was confronted with the hostess by overlooking the price of alcohol using the credit card left by the passenger, and he said that while the hostess went to call for someone, he only stole money from his wallet and ran away.He claimed all charges of robbery, murder, and sexual crime Denied.

In particular, he claimed that he did not drink with the hostess and that there was no contact.

At the time, at the time the victim was estimated to have died, a witness who witnessed the victim in the bathroom came out and weighed Go's allegations.

However, at the scene of the incident, traces of drinking alcoholic beverages by Mr. Ko and the hostess, who were the last guests on the day of the incident, remained.

In addition, a number of wounds were found on the body such as Ko's forehead and neck collarbone. Mr. Ko's gene was found in the victim's fingernails, and experts said, "It was from a situation where the victim was scratching in the process of resisting the assault. It is estimated."

However, Mr. Ko did not bend the claim that these wounds were also caused by other reasons.

And the gene detected in the hair found under the victim's right wrist was also consistent with that of Ko's.

However, at the time, Mr. Ko said he was unbelievable about the test results, and the person in charge of genetic identification even gave a testimony about this.

However, experts said that the probability of DNA matching with another person cannot be "10 to the 15th power".

At the scene of the murder of the owner of the cafe, the earth leakage breaker was lowered and the water was full.

However, the trace of the crime remained as it was because the water was filled to the extent that the inner chamber where the victim's body was located was not exceeded.

And traces of water, a peculiar part of the crime scene, were also found elsewhere.

A white slip covering the victim's undressed bottoms.

Underneath it was a sprayer and a plastic basket of water.

In addition, the victim's vagina contained a container of vaginal cleanser, and despite the rarely seen crime, there was no punishment law for similar rape at the time, so the criminal Ko was able to escape the charges of sexual assault.

How similar is the scene of the murder of a mistress of a so-kitchen room to the murder of a cafe?

At the time, the police said about the So-Kitchen case, "After the crime, it seems that the criminal turned off the lights, locked the door, and took the key, but this seems to be the act of an acquaintance who knows the rescue."

And the police thought it would be easy to solve this case at the time.

Since there were signs of theft, he thought that he would be sure to dispose of them, and he thought that if he traced them, he would be able to catch the criminal.

However, no matter how much time passed, the situation of disposing of the damaged product was not captured.

In addition, fingerprints left on the evidence at the time were crushed due to condensation and moisture on cups and bottles, making it impossible to recognize them.

However, when the police saw the scene of the'Café Mistress Murder Case', they considered it to be the same crime, and if they caught the culprit in this case, they thought that the murder case of the mistress of the small kitchen could be resolved.

The mistress of the sojubang was in the same state as the cafe mistress, with the bottoms removed, and the lower body covered with a beach towel.

And next to the body, there were three kinds of water basin, and like the cafe hostess, there was a strong sleepy scar on the neck.

However, there was no evidence to identify the perpetrator at the scene, and Mr. Ko even made a stride that he had nothing to do with the so-called kitchen case.

Also, no alibi could be found indicating that he was there on the day of the incident.

The production crew met Ko's mother and asked about Ko.

Then, Ko's mother complained of her son's resentment with tears.

Accordingly, the production team promoted a meeting with Mr. Ko.

After meeting the production crew, Mr. Ko insisted on his innocence against the'Café Mistress Murder Case', saying that he was only thinking about how to solve his resentment.

At the same time, he was unsure about why his DNA from the victim's nail came from.

And when I asked about the gourds in the cafe's inner room, I replied, "I don't know. The person who brought it wouldn't know."

Also, when he asked about the So-Kitchen case, he said, "Last year or not, detectives have come and gone. The case has already ended because an eyewitness confronted me and said I was not."

But the detectives still couldn't stop thinking that he was the culprit in the so-called kitchen case.

The detective said that in addition to the criminal tactics in the two similar cases, the fact that similar cases no longer occurred after Mr. Ko was arrested raises the suspicion that he is the criminal.

In order to learn more about the incident, the production crew replayed the scene and asked the profilers to analyze the incident.

First of all, the profilers said that it "looks like an accidental offense" in the small kitchen case.

It also noted that the attack on the victim would have been in the kitchen where the victim died, and the attack using kitchen tools.

And, for the very little blood left on the scene, he speculated that he would have put effort into destroying the evidence.

He also explained about the bloodstaining under the bucket, "It seems that the bucket was moved and the evidence was destroyed before washing it with water. It is assumed that only the visible was washed and ran away."

And he also talked about body covering.

Body covering is an act of covering the body of a deceased victim by covering it with clothes or cloth, and it was analyzed that the act of covering the body of the deceased victim by covering it from the feeling of guilt arising from the crime, but this case is different.

An expert said, "It seems to be to cover up partly undressing. This act of undressing without any signs of direct sexual offenses is also a part where you can see the sexual orientation."

Next, a profiler analyzing the scene of Lilac Cafe The profiler analyzed that "the body covering is revealed in this case as well," and that "the partially undressed victim is covered with clothes, which seems to be very similar to the small kitchen case."

Another profiler said, "Injecting foreign objects into the vagina. It is a peculiar behavior, but this is also not a direct sexual violence, but it is a part that reveals the sexual orientation of the perpetrator. "This behavior is consistently revealed, but the similarity between the two cases is strong.

He said, “It seems that it is the same person or the same offender.” In

addition, even though the murder took place, it is difficult to see the first offender's actions taken. “I am familiar with crime, and things like theft and robbery are embedded in my body. Even if a murder occurs, such a theft can be performed.”

And the production team compared the autopsy results of the bodies of the two cases. Experts said, “There were many events in the So-Kitchen case, and I also suffered from embarrassing conditions. Strongly tease.

“I killed him by stabbing him in the neck.”

In addition, regarding the case of the cafe

, he said, “I

killed strongly at once and even inserted foreign objects.

This seems to be a planned murder.” The

different scars on each other's necks mean that the hands used are different, and from this it can not be concluded that it is not the same criminal's actions. He added, “There is a possibility that he strangled with his left hand while holding it.” And he added, “Because he has his own enlightenment in the previous case, the crime may have evolved in the latter case.”

And the shoulders and back of the mistress of the Soju room A large number of wounds left in a round shape on the side, the expert said, "It seems that some weapons have cost you 10 times.

However, this is not a sword, it is a weapon of that kind, like the tip of an umbrella.” However, it was difficult to find a weapon matching this trauma at the time of the incident.

So the production team and experts conducted an experiment to find a weapon, but finding a similar weapon was

difficult.

It wasn't easy, but the expert said, "There are not many weapons that can be paired.

It is necessary to provide more data to experts and analyze whether there is a relationship between the two incidents.” He stressed that we need to re-investigate the weapon in the so-kitchen incident.

On this day, the production crew also met with an acquaintance of the so-kitchen victim. "Before the victim died, he said he met a taxi driver he knew well with his relatives.

The victim's acquaintance was surprised to find that the area he mentioned was Mr. Ko's hometown, and that Mr. Ko's job is a taxi driver. In

addition, the motive of Mr. Ko's prison said, “Mr. Ko was sentenced to 15 years in prison. Even though I received it, I saw that the killer was correct,” he said. “There was a woman I had dated at the time.

And the mistress said he went to the so-kitchen several times because the hostess was good at it.”

So the production crew once again asked Mr. Ko if he had ever been to the so-kitchen, but he replied no

and

did not bend the claim that he was a person who did not know about the mistress.

"I have nothing to do with the incident."

So I have nothing to say.” After being released, he said that he will go back to his mother's house and prepare for retrial.

Ko, who will be completely free by October next year. This did not apply to bizarre sex crimes because they were punished for similar rape in 2012.

Mr. Ko belongs to the high-risk group of recidivism, but there is currently no basis for the law to manage him. The moment when the investigative authorities could intervene was when Mr. Ko committed a new crime, it was unfortunate that there was nothing that could be done as a preventive measure.

Finally, the broadcast defined, "If Mr. Ko is a criminal in a series of incidents, there is a possibility that a new victim will occur." I prayed that he could heal the wounds of the victims and their families.

(SBS Entertainment News Editor Kim Hyo-jeong)