From "new crown imitation makeup" to "Lao Rongzhi imitation makeup", the bottom line cannot be "imitation" gone

  Talk about Fengsheng

  Imitation makeup itself is not guilty, but while imitation makeup is popular, some people have played the wrong way, and they are ambiguous and trample on the bottom line.

  According to reports, recently, a beauty blogger from Canada V posted on Weibo, posting a selfie of himself imitating Lao Rongzhi's makeup, with the text "A certain Rongzhi imitation show, does it look like."

  Although he claimed to be "just kidding, I didn't mean to rub the heat of murderers", once the Weibo was published, it still caused huge controversy. Some netizens said, "Can murderers imitate?"

  "Imitation makeup" is an "imitation show" in the beauty industry in recent years-imitating celebrities and characters in film and television works through superb makeup techniques to gain popularity.

Some Internet celebrity bloggers used the "high similarity" imitation makeup skills to "suck fans" and gained a lot of traffic.

  "Your own makeup is your own choice", this is understandable, but the blogger's "Lao Rongzhi imitation makeup" is obviously inappropriate.

Those who are a little familiar with this matter know that Lao Rongzhi and her boyfriend Faziying were responsible for 7 lives and were suspected of deliberate homicide, kidnapping, robbery and other crimes. The Lao Rongzhi case lasted for many years and is still under trial.

  Similar behaviors dignified the use of Lao Rongzhi as the subject of imitation makeup, with the posture of chasing and imitating, undoubtedly "beautify" the murder crime invisibly, causing a wrong demonstration to the public.

  Not only that, the behavior will also cause secondary harm to the victim family.

Behind the seven lives is the fragmentation of multiple complete families. Put yourself in the position and think about how the victim's family feels when they see "Lao Rongzhi's imitation makeup"?

This bad behavior of "sprinkling salt on the wound" cannot be concealed by a "joking".

  In reality, some people often find it difficult to rely on "power red" and start to take the path of "black and red"-deliberately inverting black and white, regardless of right and wrong, just to attract attention and fans, which tube flow is "red" or " black"?

But some right and wrong should not be vague. Below the flow is the bottom line, and above the flow is the virtue.

  Returning to the behavior of imitation makeup itself, imitation makeup itself is not guilty, but when imitation makeup is popular, some people do play the wrong way.

The former “domestic makeup” that hit the Internet-calling makeup with bruises and messy hair “cool” has caused controversy.

At that time, critics pointed out that similar behaviors "no distinction between right and wrong" were actually stepping on the wounds of victims of domestic violence, illiterate and even "aesthetic blind."

  What's more, it is entertained when facing collective trauma.

The "new crown virus imitation makeup" that has been widely criticized before is this type.

At that time, the Chinese people were suffering from the raging new crown virus, but some people used this as an excuse to "create" a "new crown virus imitation makeup", which aroused public outrage and was criticized for ignorance and fearlessness.

  Makeup is originally for the pursuit of beauty, but it is not "anything can imitate makeup". Using "exquisite makeup" to tease, offend, or hurt others will lose the bottom line.

For those imitation makeup that deviates from the basic right and wrong, the attitude of the public is obviously to condemn rather than agree-you know, similar ridicule itself is to dispel the seriousness of misfortune itself.

  □Li Youli (media person)