What to do if you are the beneficiary of indifference

  Recently, the family members of the online car-hailing driver in Dongguan, Guangdong Province even ran a red light to save the baby and refused to testify, causing concern.

The passengers were a family of three with a baby. Soon after getting on the bus, the baby suddenly became unconscious.

The driver went through three red lights to send the child to the doctor. For this, he was deducted 18 points and fined 600 yuan.

The traffic police said that they needed to provide relevant hospital certificates, but the baby's family refused to testify, saying that running a red light had nothing to do with him.

The driver said that although he could not understand the attitude of the patient's family, he did not regret doing so.

Since then, the traffic police obtained public surveillance videos and hospital records, and found that this incident did exist, and was helping them eliminate the illegal records.

  Judging from the content of the report, the beneficiaries not only do not know how to be grateful, they are even unwilling to come forward with evidence to eliminate the illegal record of rescuers, and their behavior obviously deserves moral condemnation and condemnation.

But from a long-term perspective, to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of those who do what is righteous, it is obvious that we should not only rely on the cooperation or testimony of the beneficiaries, but should build a complete investigation mechanism to maximize the restoration of the facts.

  From the perspective of normal people, the beneficiaries should be grateful for the incident of bravery, and actively cooperate with the relevant departments to investigate and collect evidence, and even send pennants to those brave for righteousness or donate their property.

However, it is not ruled out that some beneficiaries are unwilling to testify or even refuse to meet for various reasons.

  From the perspective of human nature, the beneficiary’s active participation in evidence is his moral obligation, and his basic conscience and moral requirement.

If it refuses to cooperate, it is obviously ungrateful and unethical, which should be morally condemned and condemned by public opinion.

However, on the other hand, there are all kinds of people, and the beneficiaries may not be grateful to actively match the certificate of cooperation and cooperate with the relevant departments to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of those who act bravely.

  In particular, acting bravely for righteousness is an act of rescue in an emergency. When people do bravely for righteousness, it is impossible to ask the beneficiary whether they should be grateful and whether they should be accompanied by a certificate of cooperation.

In other words, when people act bravely when they see righteousness, they often do not demand the morality and character of the rescuer. This is the nobleness that should be commended and praised for acts of bravery in righteousness.

  However, those who act bravely need not demand the perfection of the rescued target. In safeguarding the rights and interests of those who act bravely, the relevant departments should consider various possibilities. That is, the worst factors such as non-cooperation and non-testing of the rescued target should be taken into consideration.

In turn, other investigative measures can be taken to restore the truth and ensure that those who do what is right are not wronged.

  As far as this incident is concerned, with the testimony of the beneficiary, it is naturally easy for online car-hailing drivers to eliminate their violation records.

However, without the beneficiary’s testimony, or the beneficiary’s refusal to cooperate, is it impossible to restore the truth?

Obviously not. As the report pointed out, the relevant departments can restore the facts by obtaining public surveillance and video, obtaining evidence from hospital records, etc. It is not that things cannot be done without the testimony of the beneficiaries.

  Therefore, when dealing with similar incidents, it is obvious that the testimony of the beneficiary must not be strictly required to protect the legal rights of the righteous and courageous people, and it is not possible to impose the beneficiary to pray for testimony to the righteous and the courageous as an additional obligation.

Relevant departments should take the initiative to provide help and guidance to those who are righteous and courageous, assist them in collecting evidence, or collect relevant evidence according to their powers, and then restore the truth, so that those who are righteous and brave will no longer feel chilly.

Comics/Chen Bin