Asymmetric sanctions in Minsk

Added to the US sanctions war against the rest of the world was a small but expected sanctions clash between Belarus and the Baltics.

Minsk approved an asymmetric list of sanctions against the Baltic countries.

The reason is obvious - interference in the internal affairs of Belarus.

During his visit to Moscow, the head of the republic’s foreign ministry, Vladimir Makei, after a meeting with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov, said that Minsk was categorically opposed to revolutionary upheavals organized by external forces.

Moreover, according to the head of the Belarusian diplomacy, the European partners told him the same thing, assuring that any external interference, like any street protests for the sake of exerting pressure, is unacceptable.

“Long before the elections, when we met with our European partners and discussed various prospects for the development of the situation, we were absolutely unanimous in the opinion that any street, any violent demonstrations would throw our relations back many years.

Unfortunately, this is what happened, ”the head of the Belarusian Foreign Ministry states.

But, as always, the West deceived its Belarusian counterparts, and as soon as the elections were held, it immediately turned on all the instruments of its foreign policy intervention and revolutionary pressure at full capacity.

And what about the agreements?

As if they did not exist.

To put pressure on the "last dictator of Europe", as the head of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko is openly called in Europe itself, as usual, globalist network proxies were used - the former republics of the USSR (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia), and now - the spaces used by the West for network expansion to the East.

While networked, but military is also possible.

To implement the scenario of the “color revolution” in Belarus, Poland was also involved, but this is already more serious, because if no one takes into account the Baltic countries in Europe, then Poland has repeatedly shown its teeth, demonstrating its sovereignty and dissenting opinion on any issue.

Including on the issue of Belarus, which in the future Poland sees as its part.

If not all, then at least its western fragment.

And this is considered in Poland quite seriously, at the level of the country's leadership.

The severity of the threat calls for the severity of the response, and sanctions are no longer enough.

It is generally impossible to cope with such a threat to Belarus alone, so the solution to the problem of aggression from Poland is also a network solution, and in the future, very likely, direct, military, should be prepared in more detail and at the level of allied supranational structures.

In the meantime - sanctions, and only against the Baltic countries.

“Yesterday we agreed on proposals, and they have already been approved, on the imposition of asymmetric sanctions against the relevant personnel from Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia,” said the head of the Belarusian Foreign Ministry.

What is their asymmetry?

In order to answer this question, it is necessary to analyze how this in general became possible with such warm relations between the Belarusian authorities and Western countries on the eve of the elections.

After all, everything was agreed - we are holding elections, democratic, as far as possible in the conditions of Belarus and the political system that has developed there, you do not interfere and do not prepare a "Maidan".

But it was precisely this opening of Belarus to the West that made possible an attempt to violently, through pressure from the street, oust Alexander Lukashenko and his elite.

Simply because, having accepted the assurances of Western partners, the Belarusian president relaxed on this score, deciding that his rears were now not in the East, in Russia, but in the West, and that they were now covered.

In fact, any opening to the West always leads to disaster.

The whole history of our, Eurasian civilization, Greater Russia (and Belarus, of course, is an integral part of it) is an endless series of confirmations of this statement, which no longer requires any additional proof.

Moreover, nothing will change in this regard in the future.

If at least one more ambiguity is allowed, one more doubt on the part of the Belarusian elites, again some kind of smile towards Mike Pompeo, some kind of nod towards the European Union, another friendly visit to Washington - and that's it.

The end.

There will be no Belarus.

And there will be pure Ukraine, smoking ruins, internal strife, civil war and another devastated territory controlled by the West and used as a springboard for pressure on Russia.

There is no need to be mistaken on this score.

A multi-vector policy is nothing more than an opening to the West with a natural end.

Moreover, given the current political system that has been taking shape in Belarus since 1994, with the achieved concentration of power, the decision on the geopolitical choice of Belarus may well be taken personally by Lukashenko, alone, with his political will.

And this not only will not separate, but, on the contrary, will unite and strengthen the unity of the Belarusian society, since it will once and for all eliminate the ambiguity that divided the Belarusian society into two different camps.

One (the Russian majority) all these years believed in rapprochement with Russia, the second (the pro-Western, liberal minority and the Belarusian nationalists who joined them) believed in rapprochement with the West.

Actually, Lukashenka staggered precisely because he abandoned his basic, nuclear pro-Russian electorate, which sees itself as one with Russia, to the mercy of fate.

As soon as he began his ambiguous flirtation with the West, he immediately lost support, that is, legitimacy from the basic pro-Russian electorate.

On the street, minorities always go and protest, the very pro-Western ones, which the West so convincingly promised not to take out into the streets.

Now, when Lukashenka returns to pro-Russian positions - not talk about integration, but real integration - he begins to regain legitimacy from the majority, that part of the Belarusian society that sees itself together with Russia.

Such a turn will also alleviate the domestic political situation, restoring confidence to the pro-Russian majority, and will free their hands in taking protective measures against aggression from the West, creating immunity from external interference.

Only after that, it is possible to calmly, in a working order, deal with the provocative Western liberal agency of minorities, which blew up the situation, controlled from the outside, from the adjacent territories - Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, which in this impulse joined Poland, which had long been captured by globalists.

It is clear that contradictions, problems and difficulties exist in any state, and with a competent approach, they can be shaken so that no regime can hold out, be it European countries or even the United States itself.

Such problems, imperfections and costs of the political system, of course, exist in Belarus too, there is no need to argue with this.

But this is not a reason to destroy the country, leaving it to be torn apart by globalist vultures.

Lukashenko will not survive without relying on the basic pro-Russian electorate, and this is obvious today to almost everyone who is not engaged in globalist networks, which means that it is high time to make the final geopolitical choice - from the West towards Russia and the creation of a full-fledged Union State of Belarus and Russia.

The geopolitical choice cannot be multi-vector, which only destroys and breaks between two civilizations - Russia and the West.

The geopolitical choice must be unambiguous - either Eurasian or Atlanticist.

And it's time to do it.

This will constitute the most important and precisely asymmetric sanctions - the unequivocal Eurasian geopolitical choice of Belarus.

The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.