The American side celebrated the event as a major diplomatic victory for it, and Netanyahu considered it a historic peace. As for the Arabs, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi was the first to welcome him, while the Palestinian leadership considered him a betrayal of Jerusalem, Al-Aqsa and the Palestinian cause.

Palestinian factions described it as a stab in the back of the Palestinian people and a step that dramatically reflects the level of disintegration and alienation that the official Arab system has reached.

The episode (8/13/2020) of the "Scenarios" program asked about the Palestinian leadership's handling of what will result from this new agreement, and what Netanyahu and Trump's repetition mean that Arab countries will soon weave along the lines of the Emirates.

For his part, Muhammad al-Hourani, a member of the Fatah Revolutionary Council, said that the UAE has a relationship with Israel for many years under the table, describing the agreement as closer to the stage of collapse, as it came at an election time that serves Trump's interests as well as guarantees to Netanyahu the exploitation of the rights of the Palestinian people, which the UAE has denied him with this. the agreement.

He added that preventing Israel from annexing the Palestinian lands in the West Bank resulted from a series of stances, foremost among which are the Palestinian, Jordan and the European Union, and that the Arabs are called to reconsider these positions, stressing that a distinction must be made between the people and the political orientations of the Emirati regime.

As for the head of the Al-Madar Center for Political and Strategic Studies, Saleh Al-Mutairi, he was not surprised by the agreement announced today, to the extent that he expressed his surprise at the classic re-justification that was used by many Arab countries, which is the preservation of Palestinian acquisitions and lands.

Al-Mutairi indicated that he does not expect effective action from the Arab League, as it does not have a decision to issue a statement denouncing the move, considering that through the declarations of individual countries, the situation has become far from the return of occupied lands to their owners.

Middle East researcher Sigurd Neubauer said that the timing of the agreement is beneficial to Trump's electoral interests, considering that this bet may not achieve the desired result for Trump, because the Jewish electoral base supports Democrats and Trump is not very popular with their ranks.

He indicated that the Trump administration wants to pressure the Palestinians - with such agreements - to ease their intransigence and their refusal to negotiate directly with Israel.

On the other hand, Hassan Mneinmeh, a lecturer at the Middle East Institute in Washington, said that the Palestinians have the right to feel anger, but given the UAE’s record, it should be well thought out and not considering that the Arab countries abandoned the Palestinians, indicating that some countries ’approach to different paths may lead To improve the conditions of the Palestinian people.

Meninemah added that this agreement is not a deal, but rather a notice of liquidating the Palestinian issue, indicating that the Palestinian is oppressed, and that Israel and the Arab system bear responsibility for that, as the level of Arab deficit rises in exchange for the increase in Israeli power and the absolute American support.