The eighth newsletter - Nasharkom (11/8/2020) monitored the interaction of the Tunisian platforms with the banning of the comedian, while others described his criticism of the head of the Free Constitutional Party as vulgar and offensive.

The artist described the criticism directed at him as a major "defamation" campaign that he was exposed to, and considered it an attempt to silence the mouths as it was practiced during the reign of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.

Lotfi Al-Abdali considered that stopping his shows would never be a war against him, but rather a war against freedom of expression in Tunisia.

He added that he had received a call from the Tunisian President, Kais Saied, after the uproar that arose about the cancellation of his shows, noting that the president assured him that Tunisia will remain the country of free and free people, and that the only way to settle these disputes is through justice and not withholding.

The Secretary-General of the Republican Party, Essam Al-Shabi, commented on the incident, saying: "The cancellation of more than one show by comedian Lotfi Al-Abdali, under the pressure of the November power centers, in which there is a flagrant assault on freedom of expression and a return to the policy of silencing voices practiced over decades."

"Some of us may not like what this artist or that artist offers, and whatever it is, the field of evaluating his work should remain far from all attempts at subjugation or taming," he added.

The politician, Jawhar Bin Mubarak, defended Al-Abdali, saying: “Lotfi Al-Abdali said the one who does not discuss (who does not say) in Al-Marzouki at the time of Marzouki, President of the Republic.

He added, "Lotfi Al-Abdali made full plays in which he mocked Ghannouchi and the Renaissance at the time when (at a time when) the Renaissance was ruling the country and the government was in its hands.

The song, Ahlam Rahmeh, rejected the culture of gagging, writing: "No to gagging, in solidarity with Lotfi Al-Abdali."

On the other hand, Nawras Baladi refused to go into the symptoms and said: "Criticize whomever you want, but not to go into symptoms, nor to immorality in rivalry, and this is from Islam and Muslim morals."

While the activist Nawal Nemat considered criticizing the artist a duty, so she wrote: "Condemning what Lotfi Al-Abdali came on stage is also a duty. The issue goes beyond his person and is more intense, complex and complicated than it may appear. When we condemn what he said, we protest against a prevailing culture of vulgarity, vulgarity and depravity that threatens our children." And our adolescents, and this is a primarily moral responsibility that cannot be tolerated. "

The academy believes Olfa Youssef, I, what the artist did is not considered an art, so she wrote "from the legal point of view: freedom of expression is guaranteed for everyone, but in all the laws of the world, and even in the oldest democracies, there are provisions that criminalize indecent assault, assault and slander, from an artistic perspective: art based on directness." Vulgarity is not art, but in the ages of decadence it finds its audience among those who have no artistic taste, and this is common in many countries.