We can only ask ourselves in what hands we are , if those who govern us have any vision of the State. To the logical commotion that a news such as the departure of Zarzuela from King Juan Carlos would produce , a stupor that does not stop due to the errors with which an operation of such depth has been carried out, which would have required at least the contest, has been added. of the main political forces of our country. In the same way that, for example, the abdication developed successfully thanks to the agreement between PP and PSOE and the height shown by Rajoy and Rubalcaba , it is not acceptable that Sánchez has not even informed Pablo Casado now . No wonder thePopular denounce the "disloyalty" of Moncloa. There is no doubt the extraordinary significance of the event. Not only because Juan Carlos I has been Head of State for 38 years and continues to embody one of the best pages in our history, such as the Transition. Also because all the measures that are being adopted to mark distances between the reign of Felipe VI and the sad episodes that his father is now facing, affect, without a doubt, the Crown and many populists take advantage of it to try to undermine it.

Hence Astonish amateurism and failure that has carried out the delicate matter. It was a fallacy of Pedro Sánchez to wash his hands before going on vacation to the Palace of La Mareta, a gift from the Jordanian king to Don Juan Carlos -the sarcasm of the president has no limits- and discharge all responsibility at the Casa del Rey. As we published yesterday, the Government has been negotiating with Zarzuela for weeks what measures to adopt . And Sánchez delegated nothing less than his lieutenant, Carmen Calvo , and his strong man, Iván Redondo . Well, according to how public opinion has reacted and seeing the negative impact that the march of Don Juan Carlos has had on the image of Spain in the foreign media, it can be concluded that they have made a botch . The Casa del Rey itself, of course, is not outside its responsibility, since it should have concluded that this solution was the one that entailed the most risks and damages. And the institution's communication policy has not lived up to what the society of the 21st century demands . But in all parliamentary monarchies, it is up to the government in power to set its agenda, endorse its actions and protect it with the loyalty that the laws oblige. And it is not credible that the advisers of Moncloa did not foresee that the departure from Spain of the Emeritus was going to be very poorly perceived and that not transparently informing them of their destiny only serves to feed rumors and that the enemies of the institution rub their hands .

Felipe VI took forceful steps to distance himself from his father in March, including the withdrawal of his assignment . Later, the Executive has not stopped pressuring him in public, in an exercise of great irresponsibility, to go further, imposing the departure of Zarzuela on the former Monarch. And it has even benefited its members of Podemos by not forcing them to co-responsibility as appropriate in any government , because thus those of Iglesias have thrown themselves into disgust by passing the operation by an "unworthy flight" .

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Spain
  • Philip VI
  • Pedro Sánchez
  • We can
  • Pablo Casado
  • PSOE
  • PP
  • Carmen Calvo
  • Mariano Rajoy
  • Juan Carlos I
  • Ivan Redondo
  • King Felipe VI birthday
  • Editorial

EditorialA painful gesture in defense of the Crown

Editorial Felipe VI's commitment to exemplary

Editorial Encapsulated Government Crisis

See links of interest

  • News
  • TV programming
  • Translator
  • Calendar
  • Horoscope
  • Classification
  • League calendar
  • Films
  • Cut notes
  • Themes
  • FC København - Istanbul Basaksehir
  • Shakhtar Donetsk - VfL Wolfsburg
  • Internazionale - Getafe
  • Manchester United - LASK