Experts re-validated the evidences that pointed to Park as suspect.

In the SBS'I Want to Know' broadcast on the 1st, a suspect was verified for defendant Park, who was acquitted in both the first and second courts with the subtitle of'The truth trapped in a drainage channel-Jeju Childcare Teacher Murder Case'.

On this day's broadcast, the suspect was confirmed before the Supreme Court ruling by the defendant Park, a defendant of the'Jeju Childcare Teacher Murder Case'. The production team said, "Only the final judgment of the Supreme Court remains. If innocent is confirmed, it may remain permanent."

In 2009, the victim, Yang Soo-jung (pseudonym, then 27), was found dead in a waterway. At that time, the police pointed to taxi driver Park, who passed the vehicle number reader, after investigating about 3,700 taxis in Jeju Island.

Yang Su-jin, head of the Jeju Regional Police Agency's Team for Unexplained Incidents, said, "We examined whether the test subject was aware of the items related to the incident through changes in blood pressure, pulse, etc. The result was "I know." To reveal the time of death, five forensic scientists and forensic experts were put into operation, and the first animal experiment was conducted in Korea. The suspect's identification with Mr. Park remained an excuse for scientific investigation.

However, the courts convicted both defendants Park of the first and second trials. Park said to the production staff, "It was started as a guess from the beginning. All others are receiving it, and I asked them to respond to the reference investigation. I was embarrassed and embarrassed and could not speak properly even after the investigation." Park complained, "I wish I could be caught quickly, and after that, I wouldn't be still. It's not about the true criminal, I'm not going to be still with those people who have made my family difficult."

Attorney Choi Young, who was in charge of Mr. Park's defense, said, "I've been arrested just because I was passing there at that time, and I'm still going through trials.

Hwang Min-gu, director of the Legal Video Analysis Research Institute, analyzed a specific vehicle in the road direction CCTV. Hwang Min-gu said, "The resolution itself has fallen so much. It was an old CCTV, mostly photographed at night, and the vehicle is moving. The outline, color, and presence of a cap are analyzed up to this point. "It wasn't analyzed until what it was and whether the passengers were visible inside the vehicle." The production team added that the results of the video analysis of the noodles were the same.

Prof. Sungkyunkwan Choi, a professor of forensic science at Sungkyunkwan University, pointed to the similar microfibers detected in the accused-victim's clothes. "I explained. In response to this, the production team said, "The DNA detected by the accused-victim was inconsistent and the jeans fine fibers found in the victim's body were randomly submitted without a search warrant, so they were not adopted as evidence."

The suitability of the trial's Weedmark formula (the theory that blood alcohol concentration peaked between 60 and 90 minutes after drinking alcohol and then gradually decreased) was also noted. Professor Seong-Ho Yoo of the Seoul National University School of Forensic Science said, "It can be very different depending on the behavior of the party. It is my judgment that the application of this formula itself is completely wrong."

On the other hand, Professor Park Ji-sun of the Department of Social Psychology, Sookmyung Women's University, said to the suspect, “I don't have any effort or attempt to cover up the body. I think it is the sole offender of "."

(SBS funE Jisoo Kim Editor)