After a brief meeting at the company, a recent noisy real estate talk came out. I fell into Samcheonpo, but everyone was interested in real estate, so each of them gave a word about real estate policy. However, since it is far from the metropolitan area, there was little mention of such sensitive issues as'booming house prices, lending regulations, holding tax bombs, and real estate in the real estate', and mainly talked about why the government could not keep up with real estate prices.

"Why can't I get the house price when the 22nd measure is already out?"

"That's right because it only regulates without supply. It's not a mole catching game, but if you go up, you're only thinking about hitting it with a hammer..."

"If there's an abnormal overheating in your real estate, you need to regulate it. Can I just leave it?"

"But I think something wrong with this real estate measure. I think there was a lot of criticism. The Democratic Party said it was unfortunate."

"Ha. But why do those smart people repeat the policy that failed in the past? There is a learning effect, but I really don't understand."

"It has a past learning effect, so it is more tightly regulated."


I helped a word too.

"But there's a small amount of money going into the house, so it's worth buying. People in the metropolitan area like me are going to be very crazy because the cost of housing is too high. Those who own the house are on the rising tax. I think it's better to live here except for education."

The local staff then agreed with me, but talked loudly about the envy and relative deprivation of expensive homes in the metropolitan area. Over time, the talks about real estate have softened, and again, we have been comfortable talking about company issues. The sales team leader looked at me and asked.

"I've already failed a few times. Why is the company going to do the project again?"

"Let's do it again. Actually, we didn't all do our best to make the project successful. Because of the lack of realism, we just pretend to do it all. I think I'm going to do it properly this time around the company."

"I can say this time. The direction may be correct, but it is an ideal project no matter how much I think about it. I don't understand. It's a pity why the smart head office people repeatedly pointed out the wrong way."

"Maybe not. Once we're good at the task we're given.

I tried to switch the subject by asking all the attendees not to look negatively at this "re-promoting project." carefully asked.

"Why not alleviate or eliminate the agency fee scheme when Jingu violation of regulations? At first it had a sparkling effect, but now it fades. Complaints and backlash grew."

"That's another story. I know what you mean, but let's just let it go. In fact, my opinion is that it needs to be strengthened. If you get rid of it, it will be a mess again.”

Deputy manager, he refused to cut the recommendation. He was the one who dared to introduce the system despite all kinds of opposition in the past. I tried to keep my eyes closed on this fact even though there were very few side effects, but I also encouraged him to reduce or eliminate the charges, directly or indirectly, but to no avail.


Anyway, the meeting was over and I had my own time.

Why does the government continue to insist on the failed policy, why does the head office planning team try to push ahead with projects that are unlikely to succeed, and why does the branch manager not want to abolish the deadly burden system now?

Apparently they might have noticed that their design was in error, but they also thought about why they were more obsessed with it. My conclusion is this. The reason why they are obsessed with theirs is'I hate to admit that I have done what I have done in vain' .

According to a book that studies humans, people choose to keep and strengthen it in the present and future, in order not to admit that what they did in the past was meaningless. Also, when a self-respecting self tries to admit a mistake of the past, the defense mechanism works and tries to give some meaning to the mistake anyway with the feeling of holding the straw. As a result, as you saw above, government officials, head office planners, and branch managers said, "Yeah, my mistake (mistake) in the past did not make the policy successful. But I realized what the problem was because of this mistake. The mistake is meaningful, because with it, everything can be normalized," he said, pushing the original policy again. But is this true?

Just because all of these obsessions (convictions) are added, the task does not succeed. The self-respecting self-assertion that what I have done in vain attempts to create an endless excuse to impart order (justice) to this chaos (even if it is persuasive and attractive), but delusion is nothing but delusion. But is it only for government officials, head office planners, and branch managers? I? So am I.

I must keep in mind. I must admit that what I did was vain when my pride was injured. This will reduce the damage to the company.


#In-It #In-It #Kim Chang-Gyu #After all, # Meet'In

-It' to read with this article.
[In-it] tax, tax, gnome tax