A surviving family member of former Central Intelligence Agency, Kim Jae-gyu, who was executed for the '26.26 incident' that killed former President Park Jeong-hee, filed for retrial.

It has been 40 years since the death penalty was executed.

Why did they ask the court to reconsider? Chun Doo-hwan, who was the head of the joint investigative division at the time, concluded that it was murder for the purpose of rebellion committed by a patient with hyperlomaniac who would become president.

At the recent press conference, the request group for retrial claimed that it was an unavoidable murder for liberal democracy and that Kim Jae-gyu's motive for murder was concealed.

The new military has distorted and exaggerated the simple murder case for the purpose of taking control of the regime.

Attorneys at the time argued that the ruling process was not overlooked.

It is unconstitutional to prosecute former civilian Kim Jae-gyu to the military law conference, and that the Security Command has intervened directly in the trial with a note.

Kim Jae-gyu's remarks that he revolutionized to protect liberal democracy were often restrained by the judge, and were also removed from the trial documents.

It was unprecedentedly early that six months after the prosecution, the death penalty was executed three days after the Supreme Court ruling.

Experts see the possibility of retrial as high.

This is because there are a lot of misapplied parts in the current jurisdiction, and there has never been a civil war.

This week, <News Story> meets Kim Jae-gyu's bereaved lawyers and examines whether the re-evaluation and re-evaluation of the '10.26 incident' can be achieved.