Some netizens are left to the singer IU malicious comments are frowned upon to show an attitude does not reflect batgodo sentenced to fines.

The last 24 days, the online community has in relation to IU after another malicious comments netizens have received a call from the police station. However, they appeared to mock collective publicization and plan a fundraising campaign, saying, "Who's not to be scared of this? I'm going to make public affairs, petitions, articles, etc. big."
There were even those who left high-level ills, saying, "I haven't done anything bad, but I don't understand why I'm suing."

Another one had actually claimed that netizens said danghaetdago complaint directly to the IU's own public comment entailed to IU and "there is nothing to judge abusive or defamatory criticism is fair."
According to agency officials IU, IU is to persist in 2015 has received the malicious comments of such information. All about 'pedophilia debate "which was filed in 2015, IU has had formal apology, five years on from now," leave every move IU selling a pedophile image "," made his money in one way or another before, "It was that the bad guys continued.

Akpeulreo IU have protested that "legitimate criticism, but to blame." They argue that as a public official, you should be flexible in accepting this criticism.

But IU sides warned that "any future agreement and will respond without mercy ganggyeonghi through continuous data collection and self-monitoring," said, "I will take the regular criminal complaint and civil claims for damages, including any legal action civil ∙ criminal."

(Photo = EDAM Entertainment, Online Community)

(SBS SUBSTAR )