Regarding the description of the draft of the National Security Law of the Minato District, there is an intriguing detail: When drafting the draft, "the full consideration of the actual situation of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region has been made and the text of the draft law has been revised and improved repeatedly in the spirit of absorbing as much as possible." In this regard, all sectors of Hong Kong society generally believe that the draft law respects reality and respects Hong Kong.
For example, in terms of legislative technology, the draft is well connected, complementary and compatible with the relevant national laws and local laws of the special economic zone. Especially in terms of legislative content and wording, it has taken into account the concerns of Hong Kong society. I believe that Hong Kong citizens who understand the law and know the law will not feel strange, and this will also eliminate public doubts.
All circles in Hong Kong are looking forward to the national security legislation and hope to pass and implement it as soon as possible. A legal scholar from City University of Hong Kong also said that the relevant legal arrangements are suitable for Hong Kong’s existing legal system and will not affect Hong Kong’s common law system. This represents the mainstream voice of Hong Kong. However, there are still some unprovoked attacks by the opposition, disturbing public opinion and interfering with audio-visual.
A deputy chairman of the Hong Kong Bar Association said that the Chief Executive appointed a judge to deal with crimes against national security, saying "unheard of." The fact is that the Chief Executive has appointed judges to try certain types of cases, and there have been precedents in Hong Kong's judicial practice. In countries such as Britain and the United States, it is also common for judges appointed by specific channels to hear cases in special courts. As a senior lawyer, if you open your eyes and talk nonsense, how can you have professionalism and professionalism? This is stipulated in the national security legislation, which does not undermine judicial independence, but also respects the current legal system of Hong Kong.
Another member of the opposition legislature said, "Hong Kong people and foreigners in Hong Kong have lost their basic human rights protection." The fact is that national security legislation complies with the spirit of international conventions and the principles of the rule of law prevailing in the world, and human rights are protected to the greatest extent. Could it be that this "Member" and his associates enjoyed more rights than they do in the British colonial era? National security legislation has released the greatest trust and the greatest goodwill. Encountering this kind of "love against colonialism" complex is both ridiculous and unacceptable.
Hong Kong citizens are tired of these legal politicians who "reverse every occasion". These people have not yet adapted to this historic transformation of Hong Kong’s return to the motherland, and they often misinterpret the "one country, two systems" and the Basic Law. In the current national security legislation, they seem to have forgotten the country and the major risks facing national security. They may be better able to adapt to the long-term "non-defense" situation in the field of Hong Kong's national security. They also hope to seek private gains in Hong Kong where the national security is "non-defense". Naturally, they feel "unheard" of legislative measures that "patch" national security. Just as some of them were squirming or irresponsible on the issue of Hong Kong’s return to the motherland, their obstruction of national security legislation was only a turbulent wave in the long history of history. How could it affect the “big river eastward”?
The Central Government has always upheld seeking truth from facts when solving the Hong Kong issue. Deng Xiaoping said that adopting the "one country, two systems" approach to solving the Hong Kong issue is not a momentary emotional impulse or trickery. It is entirely based on reality and fully takes care of the history and reality of Hong Kong. It is for this reason that the Basic Law formulated over 4 years and 8 months highlights the characteristics of "one country" and takes into account the differences between the "two systems". It has won praise from domestic and foreign exchanges and provided a correct return for Hong Kong's smooth return and long-term prosperity after the return The direction and strong system guarantee.
Today, advancing national security legislation within the framework of "one country, two systems" has inherited the spirit of seeking truth from facts. Fully consider the particularity of Hong Kong, taking into account the differences between the two legal systems of the Mainland and Hong Kong and the two judicial systems. Isn't it the original intention of "one country, two systems" to safeguard national security, safeguard national sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity? "One country, two systems" is the largest convention in all sectors of Hong Kong society. The maintenance of national security legislation has maintained the same original intention and gave Hong Kong society the greatest confidence.
National security legislation, yearning for it. The overwhelming majority of Hong Kong citizens are expecting the implementation of the National Security Act in the port area as soon as possible, and regard it as a "guardian deity" precisely because the legislation takes into account the reality of Hong Kong to the greatest extent. Is it possible to carry out legislation to safeguard national security and protect national security, Hong Kong security, and home security?
Changfeng