[Commentary] Recently, the self-media "Tiger's second half of life" with 180,000 followers was blasted to "sell money". "Tiger" claimed to be a patient with advanced lung cancer, his parents were sick, and he still had hundreds of thousands of foreign debts. However, he shared his stories of active anti-cancer through short videos, which attracted the attention of netizens, and many people gave him Like "reward". But not long ago, some netizens reported that "Tiger" punched in more than 500 consumer places in 2 years, including the record of maintaining BMW cars in 4S stores. "Tiger" also fell into the whirlpool of "selling money".

  [Explanation] In response, "Tiger" posted a video response saying that he was not selling miserably, but recording real life conditions, and never opened a fundraiser to the public. The consumption records on meals released by netizens were only drawn. Overlord meal.

  [Same period] From the media "The Second Half of Tiger's Life"

  It can be said that the seafood set meal in the public comment is all overlord meal. This has the words of free consumer reviews below each review to prove that a cancer patient does not even have the right to sign up for overlord meal ? What kind of tobacco and liquor store, foot bath, and hotel for two thousand dollars are nonsense. These are just to complete the monthly membership tasks in the public comments, just casually count, and even take other photos to write reviews.

  [Explanation] In this regard, the video platform issued a statement saying that it has filed with the relevant departments and added a "content dispute" logo to the relevant content. If the user’s content is subsequently faked, it will cooperate with the judicial authorities to deal with it seriously. . At the same time, the legal profession responded that if the self-media is checked for content fraud, its behavior may constitute a crime of fraud.

  【Same period】Legal practitioner Guo Xiaoming

  If you make up fake sympathy to "sell miserable" Bo sympathy to get traffic, netizens have a wrong understanding, believe that the author of the media is seriously ill, and make rewards or similar rewards based on compassion, even if he does not express clearly Netizens are asked to donate and reward, but he is actually an indirect intention to obtain such benefits, and he may still be suspected of fraud. Depending on the amount of benefits obtained, it may be suspected of violating public security or fraud.

  [Explanation] In addition, Guo Xiaoming believes that individuals who have already won rewards have the right to claim back.

  【Same period】Legal practitioner Guo Xiaoming

  (If he has fabricated a false medical condition) This behavior is suspected of violating the Cyber ​​Security Law. At the same time, this behavior is also suspected of using the network to infringe the property rights of others. It should bear the tort liability, and the individual who has won the reward has the right to claim it.

  [Commentary] At the same time, Guo Xiaoming reminded that the video platform should strictly implement the management of the information released by its users, establish and improve the dynamic monitoring and user reporting mechanism, and promptly deal with violations of laws and regulations. In addition, the platform should also strengthen publicity to guide users in accordance with the law Publish information in accordance with regulations and strictly self-discipline.

  Reporter Shan Lu from Beijing

Editor in charge: [Ye Pan]