The most cunning and coordinated strategy of the Hindu national movement (Hindutva) - of which the current BJP government in India led by Narendra Modi - is an integral part of it is to follow three contradictory policies in Kashmir.
First, arming the majority to impose homogeneity. The second is to incite the majority of fundamentalists to break the law in exchange for imposing compliance with it on victims of violence. The third is its claim to protect freedom of expression, assembly, and opposition, while describing any Muslim or Christian trying to use these rights as incitement or terrorism.
Each of these tricks contains more internal dissonance, which in turn fuels the complexity of the Hindu None of these tricks can actually be understood outside the psychosomatic relationship between cheese and oppression, or by Professor Simon called it "aggressive predator" and "narcissistic bullying", practiced openly by Hindu Hindu fanatics and members of the Indian National Volunteer Organization (RSS) .
All of this comes in the context of promoting their broader political goals - and in particular - to quell the revolt and subdue Kashmir. More generally, the direct impact on the lives of Muslims, Christians and Dalits throughout India as well.
First, the Indo-Indo-India project seeks to spread the term “we are all alike”, which on the surface appears to be taken from the ideas of utopia, but it is really an innocent claim. Insisting on cultural and ethnic homogeneity in a vast area of South Asia - which is home to dozens of languages, cultures and ethnicities - is Absolutely unrealistic. Consequently, it is a sugar-coated term intended for international consumption to provide an ethical cover for the practices of project supporters.
As in Washington's smart Irving quote: "Evil wears many masks, the most dangerous of which is the mask of virtue."
The Indo-Indo-India project seeks to spread the term" we are all alike ", which on the surface appears to be drawn from the ideas of utopia, but it is really an innocent claim. Insisting on cultural and ethnic homogeneity in a vast area of South Asia - which is home to dozens of languages, cultures and ethnicities - is something It is totally unrealistic, therefore, it is a sugar-coated term intended for international consumption to provide moral cover to the practices of project supporters
This ideological trap drives the majority to work in the interest of the project owners and adopts double standards: on the one hand they demolish mosques and execute Muslim merchants and threaten to rape the bodies of Muslim women, and on the other hand they raise Gandhi’s slogans in calling for peace, and then impose change because “we are all one” The approach of the Hinduva project.
Second, Hindu advocates publicly recognize that not all people are equal and impossible to be. In reality, the ruling BJP member Subramanian Swami, who has a degree from Harvard University in India, attacked Muslims by declaring that they were "not equal" to others, a violation of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.
The law in the eyes of the Bharatiya Janta Party - and without any doubt and whether it was applied in India or in the occupied areas of Kashmir - has no value more than the value of the paper on which it is written, as its only value lies in the party's ability to manipulate it, whether by unlawful cancellation It is not constitutional for Article No. 370 in Kashmir, or approval of the Indian Race Amendment Citizenship Act, or as is now happening in the case of amending the Kashmir Residency Law that paves the way for the start of waves of demographic change in the region.
In short, the Hindutva Project harnesses Indian laws and uses political deception to justify its policies. Meanwhile, after putting tens of millions of people outside the scope of the constitution and the law, project proponents say sweet, but absolutely meaningless words, and the goal is to deceive the public to subjugate them and prevent the oppressed from gaining energy, power, and action against their tyrants.
After all, persecutors are told - all the way cold, even though they are victims - that they should not take their rights into their own hands. Instead, they are urged to submit their complaints to the concerned authorities, and then wait for justice that will never come.
Third, Hindutva followers build their policy on pride in the Indian heritage of cultural tolerance and freedom of expression, but they undermine the participation of Muslims, Christians, and indigenous Dalits in civilian life. Rather, they aim to weaken all representatives of indigenous religions, especially Muslims, as only the survival of Muslims who do not practice their religion is encouraged, and they cannot be distinguished from their surroundings from non-Muslims.
Therefore, any act by Muslims who proudly use the vocabulary of their religion and culture - to show power through it - is a sectarian, unpatriotic, or fundamentalist act. They even equate incitement to the newly formed government of the disputed Kashmir region as unrepresentative to the people as it does not include any Kashmiris, except for one person from their point of view. In other words, attacking their sectarian policies is a sectarian act in their view.
Together, these hostile policies seek to marginalize Muslims, including preventing them from launching beards in the Indian army, although Sikhs are permitted to do so. This is in addition to preventing them from chanting inspirational Islamic slogans because they may lead to a feeling of distinction
In the social / cultural context of Muslims, every Muslim invokes prayers to God, whether the request is sacred or worldly related to worldly or heavenly affairs, as the Islamic model does not divide life into classes that differ God’s response to it.
Hindutva followers base their policy on pride in the Indian heritage of cultural tolerance and freedom of expression, but they undermine the participation of Muslims, Christians, and indigenous Dalits in civil life. Rather, they aim to weaken all representatives of indigenous religions, especially Muslims, where only the survival of Muslims who do not practice their religion is encouraged, and it cannot ostensibly to distinguish them from their surroundings of non - Muslims
Consequently, the authentic reading of Islamic traditions acknowledges that this interlocking of sacredness and worldliness is based on intention, but all methods are closed to the Indian Muslim who wants to be authentic and express his faith and belonging in a healthy and effective way.
The Indians of Kashmir were always seen as foreigners, and therefore they had to take these hostile policies to counter that view. Despite all this, Indian Muslims gladly accept India as their home, but unfortunately they face the weight of a totalitarian state that does not accept the other.
In the end, what Hindutva's hostile strategies achieve is the following:
- First, weakening the power of Islamic interconnection and filling it with suspicion by instilling a sense of shame and shame of their heritage, to discourage their resolve and prevent them from taking a position, then to replace that with a false promise of equality.
- Second; violation of all laws in the Indian Constitution on the rights of minorities in India or in the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir, then approaching the affected segments of society and directing them to the courts so that the case goes on for several years. The goal is to calm feelings that could trigger possible revolutions, and to reduce negative reactions.
- Third; aiming to demonize the idea of social ties to the real Muslims, which provide the necessary foundation for cultural resistance to oppression as being the work of an extremist in principle.
In conclusion, these plans become more condemnable at this particular time, given that the disputed Kashmir region - as well as the rest of the world - is suffering from the pandemic of the emerging Corona virus. However, as Professor Simon explains, cunning planners follow the advice "Show offensive intentions of the other, and with cunning he forced him to surrender voluntarily. Sow shame, or effect suspicion and guilt on himself, or sow fear; and the other - most likely - will back away from his demands that he wants Oh really".