It is the mercy of God to His slaves in this law glue that came easy easy tolerant, raised embarrassment and hardship, and manifestations are pleased and wide that its sub-provisions were not one-sided in all branches of jurisprudence, but came porters and faces and differing views and understanding in deduction and inference, which is What was known as the science of controversy, and called the science because it arises from science and devise, not from the whim and delicacy, and hence the scientists mean by great care, and decide that not be a jurist to be a master in it, aware of its origins and branches, and this dispute was a source of wealth for jurisprudence, Vastabb life everywhere and time, and this is a characteristic of Alsh The rent of Islam that ensured Muslims to maintain their religion with different hurricanes and Amsaram, otherwise people would have been in a tight if they did not find space Bean be considered and considered.
The jurists called the science of disagreement «science of capacity» and to guide the words of the faithful Omar bin Abdul Aziz, may Allah be pleased with him: What I am pleased that the companions of Muhammad peace be upon him did not differ, if they did not disagree with the capacity. In doing so, Imam Malik (may Allaah have mercy on him) took him. - peace be upon him - disagreed in the branches, and dispersed in the country, and every calamity. Rational justice for that.
Ibn Kathir said: The Mansour asked Imam Malik to bring people together on his book did not answer him, and that of his full knowledge and fairness, and said: The people have gathered and looked at things we did not know.
Thus, the jurisprudential dispute when the ancients was a source of diversity and capacity with their eagerness to know the opinion of the offender, they were looking at the offender and take it and respond to it, but with respect for the opinion of the offender, until the Imam Shafi'i famously said: Say right is possible wrong, and say others wrong wrong right. This means that the right to say no one and no one else, and it is still so until late in the time of the nation, specifically to the beginning of the second Renaissance, where the monopoly of truth and confiscated the jurisprudential dispute considered, resulting from it did not thank the consequences of unnecessary sedition legitimately No mind.
The scholars learned the time and reconciled them that the jurisprudence dispute should be restored to the forefront to widen the perception of people, and know the capacity and validity of the law for the time of modern civilization, and was one of the great conference held by the Egyptian Dar al-Iftaa yesterday, entitled «Cultural management of the jurisprudence dispute», was a great thankful effort reached Through the participants to the results make the jurisprudence dispute a diverse school of cultural maturity desired today as it was yesterday, and the conference did not stop until it issued a glue document entitled «Document jurisprudence and fatigue», to be a carrier of scholars and jurists to re-jurisprudence dispute Z and his former intellectual civilization, scientific and wealth, and a factor of unity of the nation factors and a direct cause for the spread of Islam in the prospects.
The jurisprudential dispute, which is controlled by the principles and principles of jurisprudence and saturated with its texts and purposes, is in fact respect for the human mind different in its perceptions and perceptions according to the different watered knowledge, and reached convictions, it must be respected this mind, which was a reason to honor God Almighty, and must revive the jurisprudence dispute In minds people have also resorted to it a necessity in legal legislation in civil transactions, felonies and personal status.
It must also inspire the thought that I want to monopolize strongly and was a reason for the scourge of the nation. Hopefully for this deceased nation.
«Chief Mufti Director of Fatwa Department in Dubai»
To read the previous articles of the writer please click on its name .