Americans rekindled an old, still July scam by red-hot by October. The snitch from CIA helped. I mean Trump's telephone conversation with Zelensky. Finally, the Great Khan was pissed off - so much so that he erupted unexpectedly alarming, I would even call him a hysterical, sob on Twitter:
“As I learn more and more, every day I come to the conclusion that what is happening is not impeachment, but a coup designed to take away power from people, their voices, their freedom, their Second Amendment ( to the Constitution. - E. L. ), religion, armed forces, a wall on the border (with Mexico. - E. L. ) and their God-given rights of citizens of the United States of America. ”
Tearful, you see, tweet. Not at all cheerful. We got Trump. To such an extent that he included large-caliber demagogy, he even remembered about God.
Along the way, it turned out that his opponents were up to the lantern, what to blame him for: allegedly sniffing with Russia (we heard and saw how it happened), or that he was digging under Biden’s son, the son of his future rival for the future presidential election. We in our Russia thought that it was so infinitely hated in the States, and they, it turns out, hate more than us, their Great Khan.
Along the way, it also turned out that Trump was hated not only by members of the Democratic Party and fans of the old Turkish woman Clinton, who was delighted in the physiognomy of the baked apple, but also part of the Republicans and the US special services. CIA was then tapped by a full-time employee of the CIA, in Russian by the CIA. I would create a special service in the place of Trump, subordinate only to him, and would not drink or eat anything that did not pass special control of the people loyal to him. So much has become serious.
Recall, however, that in fact the civil war began almost the day after Trump took office. His opponents, and they turned out to be special services (CIA, FBI in particular), and, as we call it in Russia, “creative intelligentsia” (remember the fury with which de Niro and Schwarzenegger attacked him), and women - yes , women, EVERYTHING (though, at first, the world-famous actresses who made American Hollywood the place of their fat earnings).
The root cause of this, of course, is the undoubted fact that Trump changed the traditional support point of American presidents - instead of the establishment, he began to rely on American commoners, on the so-called rednecks, that is, it turned out that the new president was actually a populist, and not pretending to be a populist only for to be elected president.
In addition to this change of favorites (I remind you: not actresses, not actors, not special services), there is another process, I consider it to be the main and main reason. There is a struggle of the congress (parliament) against the presidential power.
If you ponder over what Trump’s opponents really want, then you will inevitably come to the conclusion that they want to “circumcise” the status of the American president in the likeness of the status of the Queen of England - he is in power, but does not rule.
Moreover, it is Trump who wants to deprive the forces, but not the president from the Democrats.
But to deprive the power of only the president from the Republicans, only the republican president is impossible. Any president will have to lose power. This is actually exactly what the US Congress wants, but does not admit to it yet. And who can foresee what a Democratic president will turn out to be - maybe it will not be better than Trump. Well, not Joe Biden, so the next Democratic president ... Huh?
If the process of depriving the president of power continues, then open to the eyes and wiretaps, naked and defenseless, the president will not feel safe even in the toilet. And this is not a metaphor, by golly, today movie cameras already have the size of a pinhead ...
I want to point out that a similar process is taking place in the UK. Boris Johnson was the first to swing the power of the British Parliament. And he wanted, whether he had seen the matter, to “turn off” the British parliament for a month so that the parliament would not prevent him from implementing Brexit. The British Parliament does not object to Brexit, but objects to its shutdown by the Prime Minister.
The Prime Minister in the UK, the President in the United States - one struggle in the long run. In this context, our Yeltsin, who, in 1993, suppressed our Supreme Council of the Russian Federation in his favor, also becomes very well understood, fits into this process of struggle between parliaments and heads of state.
Interestingly, the fact that Ruslan Khasbulatov, the head of the Russian parliament, was a man of Yeltsin did not play any role. For his sake, they voted seven times then, until the Armed Forces elected Khasbulatov. It was not a matter of personalities, but of authority, to whom it belongs. Yeltsin then won.
Such are the things.
Let's get out of the tenacious charm of simple explanations (well, like, the establishment, the American nomenclature, can't stand Trump's upstart) and let us think broadly - more broadly than we usually think. Then it becomes possible to understand what is happening in the world.
The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the publisher.