The European Parliament is willing to rewrite history, trying to shift all the blame for World War II to the USSR. Stalin is a dictator worse than Hitler - the rhetoric of European parliamentarians is understandable.

Is it necessary to remind that the Third Reich is not only Hitler Germany? Almost all the states that make up the European Union were Hitler's allies in one way or another. Unknowingly, but rather consciously sharing the blame between Germany and the USSR for the attack on Poland, they relieve themselves of responsibility for millions of victims.

The first throw was made by the Die Welt newspaper, breaking out in a large article about the battle of Prokhorovka. According to the author, the battle was invented by Soviet propagandists. Having collected some evidence of the battle participants that were not verified by anyone, the newspaper is trying to present the tank battle as an insignificant battle. Only a few dozen tanks, not thousands, were destroyed, this battle had no effect on the defeat of the Nazi forces.

A very powerful Die Welt move based on the emotions of a German reader who suffers from a loser complex. Reading the text of this respectable newspaper, the burghers begin to doubt: maybe the whole war is the invention of Soviet and then Russian propaganda?

Throws are one after another. The same Die Welt writes about the invasion of September 4, 1939, 4000 tanks of Stalin in Poland. At this time, the gallant Polish lancers on horses restrain the Nazi Wehrmacht. Gerd Alschwede was part of the Wehrmacht group, which on September 1 invaded Poland. He tells a completely different story - there were almost no fights, and the Poles simply avoided direct clashes.

So what kind of heroic resistance of the Lancers on September 17 does Die Welt write if, according to the testimony of a direct participant in those events, the Polish army left its position on the 3rd?

The liberal public is very concerned that some secret part of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact remains under lock and key. The question is posed correctly - archives should be accessible to the public and scientists. But such a requirement must be extended to all archives. For example, to the archives of Great Britain about the flight of Rudolf Hess in May 1941, which London closed at one time. Is it because they are talking about a secret agreement between London and Berlin on joint military operations against the USSR? Former Deputy Minister of Defense of Germany Willy Wimmer asks the question: “What can be found in the British archives about Britain’s air raid on Sevastopol before Hitler did this?” There is also such a version among German experts.

Information stuffing, designed for an audience in Russia and in the post-Soviet space, sometimes reaches the bottom in its cynicism.

Even Belarus is trying to drag in the anti-Russian campaign. Belarusians are offered to think about how Stalin used them to attack Poland. In the lengthy text of the same Springer publishing house, Belarusians are told that the USSR used their land for their march to Poland. That is, they were made accomplices of the tyrant Stalin and at the same time victims, since it was Belarus that became the object of Hitler's retaliatory strike. The lie is almost invisible, but it is terrible. Firstly, Belarus was part of the USSR and writing that “its territory was used” means distorting history. Secondly, in the phrase the idea that Hitler struck a RESPONSE blow is generated! Before the assertion that it was the USSR that started the Second World War, there was only a little thing left - to inject into the version that Stalin was guilty of the Holocaust. This version is also readily procrastinated by some Russian liberals. In their opinion, Stalin, beginning to destroy his own people, opened the Pandora’s box, showing Hitler the way to get rid of unnecessary “ballast”.

It is imperative to remind Europe that of the nearly 12 million members of the NSDAP, no more than one and a half million were denazified. But the Nazis of Europe were not touched at all. After the war, they quietly moved into the category of Europeans, including liberal ones.

But there was another statement by the representative of Russia in the Bundestag - Daniil Granin. Standing behind the podium, he very dryly and specifically spoke about the atrocities of the Nazis in the occupied part of the USSR. He spoke for a long time, often paused. After speaking in the hall, silence fell for a few seconds. The Bundestag deputies sat motionless, many cried.

It is necessary to answer in such a way - so that they are silent and cry.

The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the publisher.