“Navalny left the country” - in an amicable way, just such headlines should have appeared last week. Alexei Navalny and his wife went to the States to accompany their daughter Dasha during admission to Stanford.
On the one hand, I am happy for the daughter of the head of the FBK: she will no longer have to live with her parents, in an atmosphere of constant hypocrisy and a p *** hedgehog. Again, if she had stayed to study here in Russia, would she be able to live a normal life? Question. After all, as they say, the child should not bear the sins of the father. And it seems to me that this is exactly - the sins of Navalny - that Dasha will have to work out for many more years.
And again I repeat: I'm on her side. The girl did not choose a parent, but, it seems to me, having seen the opportunity to leave him and from his protection, she decided to take this opportunity, just as she had used it all these years. And this is absolutely healthy self-defense and selfishness - survive, use the resources, since they use you. I recall that Navalny also tried to make a YouTube star and youth protest from his daughter.
By the way, about other people's children who study abroad. I remember that Navalny with foam at the mouth threw shit on the supposedly insufficiently patriotic Zheleznyak, from whom his daughters are not studying in Russia. And after all, it was precisely then, from this story, that a trend appeared to hate other people's children. Well, what about now, Alexei Anatolyevich? Are you not a very patriot that you send your daughter abroad, or vice versa - a very, but only another country? Decide - either a cross or pants. And since you are fulfilling the tasks of another state, maybe it is worth changing citizenship and getting diplomatic status? Or didn’t you give up on dick there and need it only here — from within to undermine the foundations and create the appearance of radical democracy on the basis of the controlled muppet?
And are there limits to permissible inconsistency and double standards? Yesterday, Navalny screamed about the injustice of the colossus of power and called for going out (until he did this, because then he will have a real, not conditional term), not to mention the lack of solidarity with those who are behind the riots and their families, and today leaves for the States.
And what does this departure look like against the background of searches in the regional offices of the Anti-Corruption Fund?
It is amazing how a person who constantly indicates to others the type of unsatisfactory behavior would be okay to be mistaken - we are all people (although it is known that “the bulk man is not a man”), but the fact that he still does not work out the agenda is not justified in the first place in front of his own, this is what is strange. Well, there were news and video clips of your departure from the country - so write something, say it. No, you are not worthy of even that.
Such an act does not cause respect, and what example does it show to supporters: your leader and leader takes up fishing rods, shows by his own example that personal interests are above all. And you again and again for him, only a herd of gullible rams, a small coin, the price of Dasha’s admission to Stanford, cannon fodder. You do not deserve to know that you are valuable. Navalny will only say that “Putin is to blame for everything”, anyone else is to blame, but not he.
The “conscience of the nation" and a great young man now against the background of Navalny seems Dud, who just got the idea to read a lecture on morality to the glossy heroes of the GQ Prize. Younger, supposedly more honest, more popular, without a strain ... Bulk did not manage to cut this trend. And could he, taught for years to lie, despise, use others? Perhaps in a dozen years, Alexei Anatolyevich will take the place of Zyuganov in history, but Yuri Alexandrovich will be remembered as the one who stole from Navalny the last chance to become fashionable.
The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the publisher.