Among the most moving developments that El Deceso has brought us is the strategic fracture among independentistas regarding the response to be given to the Supreme Court ruling. You have to observe the animal very closely. On one side is the fugitive Puigdemont and on the other the prisoner Junqueras . Each with its delegates in the Catalan terra . The fugitive says that we must go to the direct confrontation with the State. The prisoner to call elections. On the first possibility there is a lot of information available analyzing what happened in the month of October 2017 and the life they lead and will take fugitive and prisoner. And of course the current activity of the Catalan insurrectional masses that since that October, and including it, get up every morning to work as if the country was not in danger, foolish. It is not disposable, given his temperament and his sad life hanged by a yellow tie, that El Valido tries with any exorbitant gesture the emulation of his predecessors and ends up in jail or in exile. The serious problem that emulation has is that it does not lead to any other destination in the universal. Even more interesting is the decision of the prisoner. The judiciary ruling on crimes and the executive branch called elections immediately. Any available intelligence would think that the Executive does that to accommodate its policies to the dictated reality. That is, if the Supreme Court established that there was no crime in the actions of the Government, the logical thing would be to call elections, win them and proclaim independence, now with the endorsement of the Supreme. If, on the contrary, the Supreme Court condemns, the Government should have no other possibility than to declare the insurrectionary route solemnly closed - unilaterally they call it unilateral - and return to autonomous legality. The formidable thing, however, is that the prisoner wants elections and to follow the insurrectional route whatever the sentence. The mediocre hidden struggle will have already been seen by the beloved reader, who rejects the elections to continue sending and the other wants them to send him. What one and the other in his fanatic obfuscation ignore is a terrifying simplicity. Outside the law there is no policy or moral. And something much worse still happens for them. Outside the law there is no power. If it is not, obviously, the ephemeral power of gangsterism.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Columnists
  • Supreme Court

TADEUEquis

BalearesThe betrayal that goes from Sáenz and Salvà to the Valtonyc show

EditorialThe independentism, divided