Arsen Avakov’s reassignment to the post of head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine was arranged in a carnival and conspiracy style, as if making excuses and at the same time starting a multi-way party for the future.
The exalted deputy of the party of Vladimir Zelensky, Elizabeth Bogutskaya, who at one time was walking in the comrade-in-arms of the tie-loving Saakashvili, instantly became a celebrity when she put her correspondence “about Petya” under the camera lens. Like, Poroshenko is starting a terrible thing, and so that all this terrifying does not happen, a lightning rod in the form of Avakov, who controls the security forces and nationalists, is necessary.
There is no other way. So they brought him with a clear conscience to the new Zelensky government with all the toxic belongings in the form of national bats and Donbass blood, as if choosing from two evils and putting in place the hypothetical Poroshenko putsch to prevent.
They talked about Arsen Avakov all summer. Some promised an early resignation, others said that such a maidan mastodon couldn’t be uprooted so easily: the Azov battalion, which was subordinate to him, and the radicals, waved before his eyes and all questions would disappear immediately. A plus to his karma was also the fact that he broke up with Poroshenko and stepped aside from his elective battle with Zelensky, for which the new power team sends him restrained respect and respect.
In fact, questions about Avakov disappeared already on the eve of the parliamentary vote, when the bloody famous oligarch, puppeteer of many characters of the Ukrainian theater’s farce booth Igor Kolomoisky expressed his weighty reassignment. According to him, there is simply no other candidate, and Avakov himself, they say, is a symbol of stability. What kind of "stability according to Kolomoisky" is understandable. This is a course of power and marches of nationalists.
In this regard, Avakov acts as an important anchor and amulets, guaranteeing further drift of Ukrainian politics in line with the national course with a torch in hand. So they warmed him in the bosom. And the newly materialized Kolomoisky, who pulls the strings of both Zelensky and Avakov, will keep them in tension so that they will not be arbitrary. Although who is holding someone there and what he is holding for, go figure it out. Especially bearing in mind that all the strings and leashes lead overseas, where they vigilantly watch a tangle of selfishly intricate in Nezalezhnaya, sometimes they stir it with a wand or throw something away for a living ...
Against the backdrop of the formidable police minister, all the other garnet lads of the team of Vladimir Zelensky in the government look like riding boys on a wand - so he will look after them so that they don’t unbutton and turn off the Maidan trail.
Perhaps he would tie them with blood, some wild adventure - and everything would be sewn-covered. In Ukraine, this is now the best bond that prevents any political unrest.
Of course, the "sensational" telephone correspondence of the deputy, explaining the reassignment, deliberately fell into the information field, killing two birds with one stone. She demonstrates an irreconcilable break with Poroshenko, which means with all the "dark" past. Like, we are going in a new and bright course, gentlemen are good. She also explains the need for Avakov. Moreover, Poroshenko is radically left out of the brackets, and his last name is made synonymous with the putsch. That is, any attempts by the former Ukrainian president can now be interpreted as illegal, and this is very convenient. He simply hung the stigma “Petya the coup”, thus making him both marginalized and a reference to 1991, to his last attempt to preserve and reanimate the Soviet past, which also suffers in Ukraine.
Independent politics traditionally scare each other with Russia, but an internal threat is also needed. "Radish", on which failures can be blamed. There was Yanukovych and his retinue, now Poroshenko is assigned to this role.
Avakov is explained as if the hopelessness and temporality of the decision, but in fact, there is no way to go without him. Justifying, they declare that the curator of the All-Ukrainian Natsik will be surrounded by deputies in order to squeeze out, like a foreign body. It is possible that they also prepare such a feint in reserve, so that later all torchlight processions and national battalions can be attributed to it and cover up the shameful basis of modern Ukrainian politics.
“Avakov - damn!” - with such posters protested at the Rada. And this is not far from the truth. Still, the "Maidan" at one time opened the infernal underground, and who just did not get out. Similar shots abundantly crawled out during the years of the collapse of the Union. A demonic character such as Avakov is needed by the new president. According to a fresh legend, Zelensky-Vakula will ride him in order to get the treasured cherubichki for his native Ukraine ...
Zelensky is trying to dissociate himself from the plume of everything post-maidan, it is too toxic, bloody and corrupt, but it cannot break, is beyond its means. Without rhetoric about the return of the Crimea and the pacification of the Donbass, he is nowhere. Speaking to parliament, he voiced the main expectations of society, and this is the completion of the military confrontation in the Donbass (it is clear by what method) and the return of the Crimea. “We have to do all this with you,” the Ukrainian president instructed the deputies. But around this topic, former national figures like Avakov are firmly settled and stacked, they cannot be shoved, because Zelensky himself can quickly collapse.
The new president needs a respectable make-up, but serves all the mask with fangs and swastikas. She doesn’t refuse it, but gives out to the public (supposedly by chance) “Petya” with his diagnosis of “putsch”. With that fanged mask at the ready, Europe wasn’t comme il faut, and the bridgehead of hysteria was also tired of being. It is tired of Europe. Problem…
Vladimir Zelensky will play cunning, despite the fact that he knows his own worth, ambitious and pragmatic, he will start fanning to change masks and mimic the situation.
His team will be broadcasting about the new generation, but with old anchors and boarding hooks. Here is a fresh young Prime Minister Goncharuk. Before voting in the Rada, he recalled his participation in the "Maidan" (this is the main point in the Ukrainian political pedigree), and also stated that a new generation had appeared in the country, alluding, of course, to Zelensky’s team.
This team will try to monopolize the vector of the new in the country, while each time demonstrating its rootedness in the Maidan chernozem. To illustrate the fresh breath, Zelensky’s politicians even pulled out a story that he had been offered to run for parliament in 2016, but he categorically refused, saying that he had nothing to do among the “old herd of sheep”. This story recently began to wander from the lips of the same Kolomoisky, who continues to set trends, attitudes and viruses.
In fact, the recipe for Zelensky is simple and there is no need to flirt with the infernal: to conduct a real desovetization of the country, since in Ukraine this line was made an important part of state policy, to thank Russia for restoring historical justice to Crimea and to give freedom to the Donbass. To get rid of and with a light heart say goodbye to this burden of "evil communists" and open your story from a clean and independent sheet, without a train and tails, which the Natsiks and Bandera fans wave from time to time ...
In reality, from what is happening, it becomes clear that one should not expect any major changes, but only a change of masks and further swarming of the Maidan tangle. It is worth adding that in Russia Avakov and Kolomoisky are accused of organizing murders, using prohibited means and methods of warfare, kidnapping during the armed conflict in the Donbass. The Ukrainian president, speaking of the need to end the military confrontation there, leaves Avakov - and here, as they say, comments are unnecessary ...
The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the publisher.