<Anchor>

SBS exploration report to sell to the end, today (24th) will be the third story of the Hyosung Group who wrote the sucker for the total number of family suits.

Today, I will start with the fact that Hyosung mobilized not only lawyers but also professors of law schools in law enforcement agencies. In exchange for writing a statement of opinions, Hyosung gave professors tens of millions of won as a consulting fee, which was not the personal money of the total number of households, but the sum of money.

First,

<Reporter>

It is the statement of the payment of the lecture paid by Hyosung. The lecture date is December 20, 2013. A law school professor in Seoul is expected to receive 15 million won for a lecture on the law.

I asked him what lecture he gave to the professor who received his teaching fee. The professor says he received the money, but did not teach.

[Professor A: I found an amazing fact. There was a lump sum payment. So I was just a little crazy. (Hyosung related) There was no direct contact with anyone. It's obvious.]

Unfortunately, on the same day, another law school professor in Seoul also lectured at Hyosung and received 15 million won. Lee also told SBS that he did not teach.

The real name given to the sow was in other places. These professors also signed a legal counsel agreement with Hyosung as lawyers from all prosecutors. I would like to write a legal review, advisory, and legal opinion on criminal cases.

The amount of the deposit is 15 million won. After the investigation is completed, if the statement is submitted during the trial, 5 million won will be added.

[Professor Law School: (In one opinion statement) Usually 10 million won to 3 million won ... I did not see much in the criminal case. I usually do it mainly in big civil cases (I know).]

The two professors said that it was a large law firm, not Hyosung, who asked for an advisory contract, and that they had written a written statement under the contract. The 15 million won was not the lecture fee but the price of the opinion.

This commentary was about the corruption incident involving the gunmen.

[Professor A: (You gave me your opinion on the (paper) company?) Yes. I did that about it. Is Hyosung and Chairman Seok-rae with the highest stake? I just talked about the tax effects on those two.]

The opinions of the professors were submitted at the stage of the actual examination of the warrant.

[Kim Nam-keun / Executive committee member of Pyeongtaek Economic and Financial Center: I can not get the opinions of the public with such expenses. It is not an opinion of a single counselor, but rather a suggestion (to the judge) that "it is a fairly common topic in academia, which is a topic that is being discussed quite seriously."

In response, Hyosung explained that the two professors submitted their opinions, and that it was a business practice to treat the consulting fee as a lecture fee.

[Hyosung related person: (Professor's opinion) is submitted at the stage of the actual examination of the warrant ... How do you know so much?]

Hyosung is not only a lawyer from the prosecutor's office but also professors who have been using it to defend themselves.

(Video coverage: Jeil, Kang Dong-chul, Cho Chang-hyun, Image editing: Park Jin-hoon, VJ: Kim Junho)