[Interview] Park Joon-young "Abusing Kim Hak's case, I think it shouldn't be like this"

<Anchor>

Then, from now on, I will talk to lawyer Park Joon-young, who released the data.

[Attorney Park Joon-young (at the time, fact-finding team member): At first, I was very uncomfortable.

There were questions about the facts that were different from what I knew was the basis for judicial reform, and whether this case could be abused and continued to be used like this, and I thought,'It shouldn't be like this.'

Then, during the retrial case, I often said,'Please don't be silent about what you know.

]

[Attorney Park Joon-young: I was just trying to use it as a basis for reform of the prosecution, so I was constantly insisting on the prosecution issue, and I didn't know whether this continuous allegation would end or when it would end.

The reason why the case is used and abused in this way is'because the public opinion on the case is wrong','Then, in correcting public opinion on the case, it is important to provide the information on the case as abundantly as possible and make the people make correct judgments. Do' (I thought.)]

[Attorney Joon-Young Park: Regarding the statements about the victims of sexual violence by women, the people who saw the most records at the beginning, including myself, all saw that they are'close to innocence.' But that judgment went the opposite way after the president's talk. This is because it is impossible for a person to be criticized that the judgment made by a lawyer with grounds and confidence is changed by public opinion and the will of power.]

[Park Jun-young Lawyer: Yes. Former Vice Minister Kim's behavior in question must be held responsible accordingly. However, it is not justice that the person himself is responsible for more than one action. Due process, the constitution has a due process clause. We have to go through due process to find out the reality. That's the principle. That principle cannot be undermined in this case of former Vice Minister Kim.]

[Park Jun-young Lawyer: Yes. It is such a misunderstanding that it is clear that the political forces that are opposed to the passport can help anyway through publicizing and publicizing political events. But that doesn't mean I'm afraid of this misunderstanding, so I can't leave the problem of this case as it is. That is the greater damage to our society. And because the misunderstanding is actually scary and burdensome, I will try to make sure that it is never used by any political action, affiliation of a political group, or anyone with a political purpose. I'm telling you that.]