For years, the German auto industry has been hiding behind a narrative when asked about its high dependency on a country with an unpredictable regime.

Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess once tried to make a historical comparison when asked why he is sticking to his plant in western China, even though there are human rights violations against the Uyghur people in the region.

“We were also in South Africa during apartheid.

Shouldn't we have done that?" said Diess and said that "even Nelson Mandela said later" that it was "a good thing that we stayed in South Africa despite apartheid".

Last week, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Diess summarized the position in one sentence: German industry "cannot limit itself to working only with democracies".

Christian Muessgens

Business correspondent in Hamburg.

  • Follow I follow

Henning Peitsmeier

Business correspondent in Munich.

  • Follow I follow

Gustave parts

Business correspondent in Stuttgart.

  • Follow I follow

These or similar formulations can also be heard from other German car managers who long for a normalization of the conditions in the currently shattered global economy.

But since Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine and China's questionable role, nothing is normal anymore.

After the recent documentation of human rights violations in Xinjiang, Western politicians are increasingly criticizing China.

Tensions around Taiwan are growing.

The rigorous lockdowns and their consequences for the economy and supply chains show what the Beijing regime is capable of.

This puts increasing pressure on the auto industry, which has been doing excellent business in the People's Republic for years, to put its local work on a completely new footing.

German politicians, especially the Greens, are no longer willing to continue the previous pattern vis-à-vis China: Beijing has often been criticized in public, but when it came to supporting the expansion of German companies on the ground, that didn't matter.

Now, for the first time, Federal Economics Minister Robert Habeck (Greens) is refusing to extend investment guarantees that VW uses to secure part of its business in China.

According to the justification from the ministry in Berlin, the “reference to a business location in the province of Xinjiang” could not be ruled out.

The human rights organization Amnesty International also criticizes VW's involvement in Urumchi, the capital of Xinjiang, where the Wolfsburg-based company has been operating a plant with its local partner SAIC for almost ten years.

"Nobody can say goodbye to China, but everyone knows that the industry there cannot continue as before," says Elmar Kades, automotive specialist and managing director of the consulting firm Alix Partners.

The corporations would have to dissolve the interdependence of their supply chains with the People's Republic and make their China business more self-sufficient.

This is the only way to reduce dependencies without having to completely withdraw in the event of a further escalation.

In the past few decades, the strategy has been exactly the opposite: interconnectedness has increased.

Lured by the huge market with its burgeoning middle class, German automakers set up large manufacturing and sales networks in China, always with local manufacturers such as SAIC, FAW, BAIC or Brilliance at their side, with whom they were linked in joint ventures at the behest of Beijing.

Today, the VW Group sells about 40 percent of its vehicles in the People's Republic, Mercedes and BMW account for about a third.

Parts from China are installed in Europe and vice versa.

Important raw materials also come from the Far East, a mode that cannot be ended overnight.

"It will take 5 to 10 years for the structures to unravel," says Kades.