In the long-standing investor test case for the nationalized former Hypo Real Estate Holding (HRE), the federal government and ultimately the taxpayer managed to avoid paying billions in damages.

As the Federal Finance Agency announced on Wednesday in Frankfurt, the model plaintiff and the legal successor of HRE have agreed on a payment of 190 million euros in a settlement.

Marcus Young

Editor in Business.

  • Follow I follow

In financial circles, higher compensation had been expected.

Because in winter 2020, a civil senate at the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) accused HRE of serious communication errors in the financial market crisis of 2007.

An earlier judgment of the Munich Higher Regional Court (OLG) that was disadvantageous for the model plaintiff was overturned at the time - the dispute over the former scandalous bank seemed to start again from scratch.

Important chapter of the bank bailout

But now, 15 years after the beginning of the global financial market crisis in the USA, the comparison also closes the most important chapter of the German bank rescue at the end of the 2000s: The troubled real estate financier HRE could only be supported by a financial market stabilization fund (FMS) that was set up in a hurry.

In order to ensure stability, HRE was nationalized in an emergency in 2009.

This made it clear that any compensation would be at the expense of the German taxpayer.

From this point on, the lawsuits brought before the courts by deceived HRE shareholders increased.

Shortly thereafter, a special investor test case (KapMuG) began in Munich.

In addition to the claims of numerous small investors, the model plaintiff, the lawyer Christian Wefers, also bundled claims from institutional investors such as Deka and various subsidiaries of the Allianz insurance group in his lawsuit.

Including the interest, the claims added up to around 1.5 billion euros.

Both sides satisfied

"We consider the settlement reached to be an excellent negotiation result for the FMS and thus for the taxpayer," said Jutta Dönges, who is responsible for the FMS in the management of the Federal Finance Agency.

In her statement, Dönges particularly thanked the current HRE Managing Director, Peter Schad, who recently accompanied the negotiations intensively.

But the investment law firm Tilp, which represented the model plaintiff in the proceedings, was also satisfied with the comparison.

Tilp partner Peter Gundermann considers the HRE case to be a “milestone” because, for the first time, claims by large German and international institutional investors have been brought before German courts against a German bank.

"The decision of the BGH and the subsequent settlement talks show that institutional investors who sue under the KapMuG are significantly more successful than in normal civil proceedings," said Gundermann.

He contradicted the criticism of the model proceedings, which are considered long and inefficient - the legal dispute HRE lasted twelve years.