The leaders of employers and trade unions were informed in advance about the Chancellor's plan for a "concerted action" against growing inflation risks and do not reject it.

However, Olaf Scholz (SPD) did not reap any great enthusiasm with his public invitation to them during the budget debate in the Bundestag: there are concerns, especially on the trade union side, that such a round of talks between politicians and the social partners could ultimately result in limiting specifications for their wage policy .

According to Scholz's analysis, wage policy plays an important role in determining whether high inflation will become entrenched in Germany or not.

Dietrich Creutzburg

Business correspondent in Berlin.

  • Follow I follow

Heike Goebel

Responsible editor for economic policy, responsible for "The Order of the Economy".

  • Follow I follow

"The aim of a concerted action must be to reduce the current burdens on private households and the economy and to develop a more resilient and sustainable economy," said the chairwoman of the German Trade Union Confederation (DGB), Yasmin Fahimi, on request.

"But it is also clear that collective bargaining is not conducted in the Chancellery." Large individual trade unions such as IG Metall, which is currently waging a collective bargaining dispute in the steel industry and is preparing for its collective bargaining round for almost 4 million employees in the metal and electrical industry, wanted the push of the Chancellor, on the other hand, did not comment specifically on Wednesday.

limited enthusiasm

In principle, however, according to Fahimi, she welcomes the proposal "to discuss the current challenges in a concerted action by employers, trade unions and politicians".

Employer President Rainer Dulger reacted almost identically – without going into detail about the content.

Both highlighted the social partnership as the main force for constructive solutions.

With the term “concerted action”, Scholz is referring to a historical format from 1967.

At that time, the first grand coalition of the Union and the SPD convened such a dialogue alliance on the initiative of Economics Minister Karl Schiller (SPD) in order to achieve a stabilizing coordination between financial, monetary and wage policies in a macroeconomic situation similar to that of today.

But it was not destined to have lasting success.

Scholz is now making similar considerations: he explained that the price increase was still due to one-off “shocks” such as the Ukraine war and supply bottlenecks.

“But we have to be careful that this does not result in a lasting development with high inflation rates.” It is clear: “Long-term subsidies financed by credit are not a solution.” This applies all the more since the traffic light from 2023 wants to comply with the debt brake anchored in the Basic Law again.

Scholz's analysis also expresses concerns that ongoing buffering of the consequences of the crisis and inflation for citizens and companies by means of government aid packages could ultimately itself become an inflation driver, similar to the large Corona stimulus package in the United States.

In his speech, Scholz explicitly addressed not only high energy prices but also wage policy as a possible driver of inflation - and in particular praised the most recent agreement in the chemical industry, because it primarily relied on so-called one-off payments instead of high permanent wage increases.