The insolvency of the former Dax company Wirecard is not only probably the biggest accounting scandal in Germany. The case also led to a professional supervisory procedure of unprecedented scope against the auditing company EY, which is responsible for Wirecard.

The work of the auditor supervisory authority APAS is significantly influenced by the Wirecard case, as the authority writes in its report for the year 2021.

"The processing of this case still ties up considerable resources in the professional supervision and in the departments," says the document published on Monday.

"The activities of the professional supervisory authority APAS were significantly influenced by the Wirecard case," writes APAS manager Michael Sell in the foreword of the annual report.

Mark Fehr

Editor in Business.

  • Follow I follow

Sell, who is a lawyer and tax consultant, only took over the management of APAS in September 2021.

So at the time when she had to deal with her probably most important and largest procedure with the Wirecard case.

The restructuring of the auditor supervision is also a consequence of the Wirecard affair.

Highly complex process

According to Sell, the investigations in the case are highly complex because there are numerous victims and different allegations against them.

The procedure is also complex because those affected are represented by different specialists and use their right to extensive inspection of files.

This involves the professional law examination of the audit of the annual and consolidated financial statements for the Wirecard financial years 2015 to 2018, including the Wirecard Bank.

The supervisory authority APAS evaluated the extensive working papers prepared by the auditors responsible for Wirecard and also granted the persons affected by their investigation a legal hearing, some of which was repeated.

With their working papers, auditors document, for example, how they carried out the audit of a company and what evidence they obtained for this.

The working papers are therefore the subject of supervisory investigations when they arise, as in the Wirecard case.

In addition to the working papers, APAS has requested additional documents and information, including extensive e-mail traffic from the auditors.

Not all of the statements and documents are available to date.

The agency now expects to receive the final outstanding comments by the end of the second quarter.

The APAS wants to decide before the end of this year whether the auditors responsible for Wirecard have violated their professional duties and whether sanctions should be imposed on them.

These sanctions can be very far-reaching.

According to the law, bans on activities and professions lasting several years are possible not only for individual auditors but even for entire auditing companies.

Lots of work for the inspectors

In addition to the Wirecard case, the auditor supervision APAS is processing numerous other cases.

At 119 cases, the number of newly initiated proceedings in 2021 was significantly higher than in the previous year with 83 cases.

Because hardly any more cases could be closed than in the previous year due to the high workload and scarce resources, the number of open procedures rose significantly from 259 to 309.

The increase also has to do with complex procedures such as the very complex Wirecard case.

Despite the high workload, the statute of limitations for open cases has so far been prevented according to the APAS.

However, the authority warns that due to scarce resources, new cases are being added faster than old ones can be processed.

There have been staff departures in the professional supervision, and the recruitment of new employees has not yet been completed.