<Anchor> The



takeover committee plans to revise the 'excess profit recovery system', in which some of the profits are collected from the reconstruction.

In that way, if the number of reconstructions increases, the supply of housing will naturally increase, but there is also a concern that house prices may rise further.



The impact on the market was pointed out by reporter Jeon Yeon-nam.



<Reporter>



This is a new apartment building in Seocho-gu, Seoul, built in July last year.



As the first target of the reconstruction excess profit recovery system, it was expected that each house would have to pay more than 300 million won, but the ward office has stopped the calculation.



This is because the underwriting committee decided to reorganize the excess profit recovery system itself.



Reconstruction Excess Profit Refund System is a system in which 10-50% of the excess profit obtained by subtracting the increase in average house price and development costs such as construction costs from the increase in house price during the business period exceeds 30 million won as tax refund.



So far, 63 complexes and 33,800 households nationwide are covered.



It is known that the transition committee will lower the levy in two major ways.



By correcting the calculation formula, the amount of excess profit is reduced first, and the levy standard of 30 million won is raised.



If this happens, you will either be excluded from the levy, or your contribution will be reduced by up to tens of millions of won.



The purpose is to increase the supply of housing by reducing the burden on the business.



[Real estate official: (reconstruction) I get a lot of tax inquiries.

There are many customers waiting to buy.

I think I'm going to sell it.

It becomes active when the reinstatement (excess profit recovery system for reconstruction) disappears.]



However, there are criticisms that it nullifies the idea of ​​reconstructing house prices going up in Gangnam and sharing huge development profits with other areas.



[Kim Seong-dal/Policy Director, Citizens' Alliance for Economic Justice: There has never been a properly large-scale complex (reconstruction fee) levied.

The things called eradicating unearned income go backwards.

Actually, it is necessary now to strengthen the (excess profit redemption system)...

.]



The reorganization plan is expected to be controversial once again in the course of the National Assembly discussion, as the law needs to be changed.



(Video editing: Choi Jin-hwa, VJ: Jeong Young-sam)



▶ Focusing on expanding the supply of 'the first house in the station area, youth cost housing, etc.'