Workers entering a new occupational field have an awareness-preparation-acquisition-improvement process for the skills required for the new occupation.
In this chain, training and external evaluation play an important leverage role.
If new occupational training and skill evaluation are allowed to continue to develop in the chaos of the initial stage, it will inevitably lay hidden dangers for the healthy development of new occupations.
Therefore, while giving full play to the mechanism of survival of the fittest in the market, we should also make more efforts.
According to the "Worker's Daily" report on February 28, with the continuous emergence of new occupations in recent years, some training institutions have launched a variety of training courses. , The training quality is uneven, the certificates are various, and the gold content of the certificates is difficult to distinguish. Practitioners and employers have doubts about the gold content of the certificates.
With the continuous emergence of new technologies, new formats and new models, new occupations are constantly being derived.
Unlike traditional occupations that have clear boundaries, many new occupations have been in constant evolution since their emergence. Job descriptions change rapidly, skill requirements are dynamically adjusted, and skill level evaluation standards are groping forward. Both inside and outside the industry need to accumulate continuously. and deepening awareness of new occupations.
In this process, a few training institutions' quick-seeking training methods, mixed training content, and evaluation and evidence collection under the sand and sand have disrupted the healthy development of new occupations to a certain extent.
The development of new occupations, on the one hand, requires the public to form a broad social recognition of the new occupations, so that workers are willing to engage in new occupations; At the same time, relevant enterprises should avoid repeating the embarrassment of having jobs in some industries but not being able to recruit suitable workers.
Cultivating high-quality laborers for new occupations can be done by transferring the existing labor force to employment or by training newly employed laborers.
Workers entering a new occupational field have an awareness-preparation-acquisition-improvement process for the skills required for the new occupation.
In this chain, training and external evaluation play an important leverage role.
The chaos of research and evidence collection under the mud and sand has interfered with the formation of skills development and evaluation system of new professional workers.
On the one hand, the formation of this chaos is that the admission requirements of training institutions are relatively lagging behind.
Relevant departments lack clear standards for the qualifications and conditions for engaging in new vocational training institutions, which has led to many training institutions rushing forward and mixed up.
Skill evaluations for new occupations are mostly skill level evaluations. With the gradual marketization of qualification certification and skill evaluation, and the transition from pre-examination to post-examination, different evaluation agencies have different focuses, different quantitative standards, and inconsistent regulatory indicators. It is easy to lead to a variety of evaluations of new occupational skill levels and grades, and "each speaks its own words".
In addition, the lagging supervision of training quality and skill evaluation is also an important factor. In the context of insufficient supervision, competition pressure and interest considerations have caused some training institutions to relax their requirements for quality and standards, and the quality of training is uneven.
The development of new occupations requires a process of continuous improvement from being included in the National Vocational Ceremony to being gradually recognized by the market, in which the training of new occupations and the formation of a skill evaluation system play an important role.
If new occupational training and skill evaluation are allowed to continue to develop in the initial stage of this chaos, it will inevitably lay hidden dangers for the healthy development of new occupations.
Therefore, while giving full play to the mechanism of survival of the fittest in the market, we should also make more efforts.
Improve the skills development of new professional workers, let skill training play its due role, and establish a system for the skill composition and level evaluation of new professional workers as soon as possible, put forward clear standards for new professional skills, and promote the development of new professional workers. Draw a clear roadmap; strengthen the management of training institutions, put forward clear requirements for training content, training system, and training quality, so that training institutions have rules to follow, prevent the training market from falling apart, and curb the phenomenon of re-examination and neglect of skills. ; It is necessary to strengthen the supervision of the new vocational training market and the construction of an evaluation system for the skill level of workers, clean up all kinds of chaos that disrupt the development of new occupations in a timely manner, and guide all links and participants in the chain of skills improvement of new occupation workers to be twisted together. rope to avoid disorderly competition.
For new career development to enter a benign track from the initial stage, it requires the joint efforts of training and skill evaluation agencies, regulatory authorities, workers, and employers.