<Anchor> The



courier union and workers in the field positively evaluated the government's measures that came out yesterday (12th).

However, most of them are non-compulsory measures such as recommendations or induction, so they are dubious whether they will be implemented properly.



This is reporter Je Hee-won.



<Reporter> The



plan to improve classification work, which is called'free labor' and is considered the core of overwork, is ambiguous.



Courier workers aren't originally their job, but couriers claim that all sorting allowances are included in the shipping fee.



This countermeasure also contained only the fundamental content of collecting opinions and reflecting them in the standard contract because of the large labor-management disagreements.



[Kim Jae-ik/CJ Logistics Courier Worker: You are blindfolded and aung.

(Headquarters) is putting off by the agency, and the agency is (posting off) to our general drivers.]



There are no restrictions on late-night delivery or the maximum working hours per day, so there are concerns that an expedient will be rampant.



[CJ Logistics Courier Workers: Somehow, they (agents) are responding in this way,'Let's



raise the

fee itself by a few percent' to avoid any losses.]

Improving the parcel delivery price structure is also a difficult social task.



The fee per case received by courier workers has dropped from 1,200 won 18 years ago to 800 won today, but it is difficult for social discussion organizations to intervene in price.



There are many consumers who say they can withstand a certain fee increase to improve the treatment of courier workers, but



[Yoonmi Jung/Seongdong-gu, Seoul: I think a small increase is acceptable because the

delivery fee is not

actually a big burden.]



Even if the fee is increased, There is more room for returning to an agency or courier than to a courier worker.



The government official explained that it is not possible to set the courier fee in a lump sum, and that it is not premised on a plan to increase.