I remembered a passage from a movie that was released more than a decade ago.

"If the hammer is light, the nail will rise."

Firm determination to correct it until the end, more strict, and somehow.

This is

the'housing financing plan'

revised by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

.



In January, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport reinforced the law to explain who, when, where, and how the house prices were paid, focusing on high-end housing.

In regions with overheated speculation, such as Seoul, fundraising plans as well as documents to prove this have been submitted.

It was also a commitment not to sit down and watch what is happening in the dark areas of the real estate market.



Such tightened regulations become tighter and stronger.

From tomorrow (27th), when trading houses in all regulated areas (regulated areas + overheated speculation areas), you will unconditionally submit a'financing plan' regardless of the house price.

Since Seoul and most of the metropolitan area are already locked up as regulated areas, it was mandatory to explain how the money was prepared to buy a house in these areas.




1. Expanding the scope of the funding plan



Until now, it was only necessary to submit a funding plan when trading'houses worth 300 million won or more' even in regulated areas.

It is based on the analysis that speculative forces are relatively concentrated in expensive housing.

However, as explained earlier, now

when you trade a house in a regulated area, you must submit a financing plan <unconditionally regardless of the price>

.

(※ In non-regulated areas, you only need to submit a financing plan for housing transactions of KRW 600 million or more, as before.) In



fact, in Seoul, the so-called'key-to-key' phenomenon in which housing prices rise to the limit of loans through successive real estate measures

.

The reality is that it is difficult to find a house under 100 million won.

The problem is the metropolitan area.

It is the government's judgment that expedient gift and inheritance still take place in the metropolitan area, where there are relatively many houses under 300 million won away from Seoul.

Therefore, it can be interpreted as the government's willingness to take care of these regions directly, not to give even small gaps.

In fact, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport explained the purpose of the system revision, saying, "There was a limit to the effective response to speculative demand for low-priced housing."



2. Expanding



the number of

targets for submitting evidence

Second, among the regulated areas, the regulation on the'overheated speculation zone' is much stronger than before.

In the meantime,

it

was only necessary to submit evidence for transactions in excess of KRW 900 million even in the Overheated Speculation District. In the

future

,

it is necessary to submit evidence for all housing transactions in the Overheated Speculation District.



In terms of regulatory strength, it is in the order of dumping area> overheating area> area subject to adjustment.

In Seoul, all autonomous districts have already been designated as dumping or overheating districts, which will be directly affected by the reinforced policy.

Metropolitan cities adjacent to Seoul, such as Seongnam, Yongin, Suwon, and Uiwang, are also included in the Overheated Speculation Zone and are affected as well.

It's possible.

In short, if you want to buy a house in Seoul as well as in the metropolitan area adjacent to Seoul, you must unconditionally submit the <finance plan + ice proof data> together.



Evidence includes a certificate of deposit balance and stock transaction details that can verify that the funding plan has been entered without falsehood.

If you received money from someone for housing, you should also identify who gave the money, whether it was your parents or siblings, relatives or couples, whether it was a couple or a fan, and whether you accidentally picked it up while walking on the streets extreme.



This is not the end.

You should also record the'how' to give and receive funds.

You must also indicate whether you have transferred to your account, inherited a deposit or loan, or handed it over in cash.

If you paid for it in cash, you should also explain why you carried that heavy bundle of money and delivered it with advanced IT technology.

If you have an asset similar to cash, you should also explain whether it is gold or bitcoin.

It means that we will find all possible'trick'.



3. The core is corporate regulation Although



the two regulations are also strong,

the final destination of this measure can be called a'real estate corporation'.

As such, it is the government's judgment that expedient gifting and speculation through corporations adversely affected the rise in house prices.

Therefore, in order for a

corporation to trade housing, it was required to additionally report what kind of company (corporate registration status), who the counterparty was (whether it is related to family, relatives, etc.), and why it would like to buy it (purpose of acquisition).

Until now, the reporting items were the same regardless of individual and legal entity, but this measure made the reporting process of the corporation even more difficult.



Furthermore,

corporations are required to provide a literally'unconditional' financing plan without conditions, no matter where or how much home they are dealing with

.

'This is the purpose of not giving me a chance to even think about something else.

Im Gyeong-in, a tax accountant at Hana Bank, said, “In the past, from the perspective of revitalizing the economy, it gave benefits to corporations, but now it means that we will increase the enormous barriers to entry. I feel a strong willingness to treat them more disadvantageously than individuals.”



● "In fact, the only effective measure"


During the interview process, I met a high-ranking official in charge of real estate policy and a professor of real estate department at the same time and heard relatively honest stories.

Although the two people had different opinions on each issue, there was one issue they agreed on in common.

That

is, of the many real estate policies that the government has put out so far, this <Funding Source Survey> is (in fact the only) partially effective.



They said it was a bigger burden than expected to explain and prove how they got the money from the standpoint of buying a house.

In particular, he explained that the burden of business or self-employed people is high.

It is said that it is very burdensome if the tax authorities trace it, and there is no choice but to mobilize funds from various places while running a business.



Also, from the standpoint of giving money, it is burdensome for you to become more clearly visible.

In particular, you will feel the three burdens more directly.

For example, donations between couples are not taxed up to 600 million won, but the tax-free range for direct existence is drastically reduced to 50 million won.



In addition, 10% of KRW 100 million or less, 20% of KRW 100 million to KRW 500 million, 30% of KRW 500 million to KRW 1 billion, 40% of KRW 1 billion to 3 billion KRW, and a whopping half of KRW 3 billion as tax. It's possible.

If the person receiving the money is a minor, the tax exemption range is further narrowed to 20 million won.

You have to pay a large portion of the money you give to buy a house in tax.



In particular, the speculative forces who received tax benefits through real estate corporations and avoided tracking are expected to significantly shrink.

Real estate transactions through corporations are often targeted at high-end homes, so the demand for such high-end homes will decrease, and home prices are expected to fall.



● 23 at-bats no hits...

It is said that the disappearing'responsibility for explanation'



tracking of funds is the only policy that works, in part.

Turning this over, it is also a proof that the rest of the policies had little effect.

In fact, the Gangnam area of ​​Seoul, which Vice Prime Minister Hong Nam-ki said has turned to a downtrend, rebounded in just a week.

That's why, "I didn't see a week ahead, so I became a'premortal refugee' by the policies I made", "23 at bats, no hits", "it's best to do nothing", "I told you to pay for the house and only catch the good people." Mocking and criticism continues.



This criticism, in the end, boils down to the fact that the government's explanation is insufficient

.

Of course, you will want to protest that the government is making its own efforts.

However, most of the government's explanations are concentrated in the early days of policy adoption.

I am only explaining diligently when I say, "If you introduce such a policy in this way, this effect will appear."



After that, I just spare no words about whether the policy is being implemented properly in the market, and if not, what supplements to come up with.

The people who believed in and relied on the government could not hide their disappointment when the explanation of the jeonse market, which is experiencing extreme chaos, was "due to Corona 19 and low interest rates."



Earlier, a ruling party politician who is directly involved in the government's real estate policy predicted (?) that "you will experience a fall in house prices in early September of August."

How does he view the real estate market two months later?

It is unfortunate in a word, embarrassing in two words, and terrible in three words that there is no specific analysis, interpretation, or explanation of a policy that has a tremendous impact on people's lives 23 times.



Bill Emmett, a British journalist who served as editor-in-chief of the economic journal Economist

, pointed out,

"The most important criterion for determining a good government and a bad government depends on whether or not the government fulfills'the responsibility for explanation' to the people

."

As power comes from the people, it is necessary to be able to reasonably explain to the people who are the owners of the state whether the main policies are really correct for the present and future of the state.

In that sense, there is no such thing as dangerous and frightening as the power that neglects'the responsibility for explanation'.



Today, many citizens and experts are giving out various opinions on real estate policy through the media, further through blogs, social media, public petitions, and demonstrations directly on the street.

Earlier pointed out the ancient Roman satirical poem Pubilius before BC.

"A lot of people are advised, but only the wise are the ones who benefit from it."

Are the government officials and government officials who are leading the real estate policy as'sage'?

The people are asking heavily.



[8 News Replay]


▶ "Under 300 million" doesn't work...

To buy a house in the metropolitan area,'source of funding'