<Anchor>
Friendly economy, reporter Kwon Ae-ri is also with you today (11th).
Reporter Kwon, it has already been a month since the right to apply for renewal of the contract, which guarantees tenants' four-year residency, has been enforced, and in this case, ambiguity continues to appear.
<Reporter>
Yes.
This law went into effect as soon as it passed the National Assembly on July 31, but as individual cases came out from the scene, cases where the answer was not clearly answered even in the commentary published by the government appeared.
Today's talk is very complicated.
I'm confused.
However, it is a very important issue for the parties.
Let's summarize the interpretation of votes issued by the Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport by case.
If you are troubled, or if you have people around you, I would like you to take a closer look at the questions and answers that appear on the screen.
A typical case of controversy is when the landlord sells the house in the presence of a tenant and the new landlord wants to live.
To start with, the government's story is that even if you think about living in a house and buy a house with a tenant, the new landlord may not be able to enter the house when the tenant's current contract period is over.
In any case, according to the new law, the tenant can exercise the right to renew the contract for 5 months, from 6 months to 1 month before the expiration date of the cheonsei contract, as shown in the table now.
From December 10th, it will be narrowed down to four months.
Anyway, during this period, the current tenant expressed his wish to live one more time.
However, the conclusion of the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport is that the current tenant's right to renew the contract takes precedence over the new landlord's right to live.
<Anchor>
What if you have already signed a buying and selling contract?
Do tenants' rights take precedence even then?
<Reporter>
Yes.
That's it.
Usually, just because the contract is written doesn't mean that the landlord will change completely.
By paying the last balance and registering the transfer of ownership, the landlord completely changes.
In fact, it often takes months from signing a contract to registering the transfer of ownership.
If the tenant contract expires six months to a month before the expiration date, and the process is in progress, the new landlord cannot enter as long as the tenant offers to live one more time.
The only way for a new landlord to live in a new home with certainty is to complete the title transfer registration six months before the tenant's contract expires.
The tenant cannot ask to move because the existing landlord also wants to live because the person who has promised to buy my house or who has signed a contract wants to live.
In the end, it can be dangerous to do business with a real resident, unless the tenant's house can be changed until registration six months before the lease expires.
However, one possible problem here is that the landlord is trying to sell with a plan to completely relocate the registration until 6 months before, but the tenant doesn't show the house because the new owner is the person who wants to live.
It cannot be forced.
But then, if you pass the six-month deadline, you can't renew your registration until then, then you may not be able to offer to sell your house to end users.
Here's the summary, it seems necessary.
<Anchor>
This is a story that is getting more and more complicated. If so, there may be cases where a house was contracted for the purpose of living before this law came into force, and the balance has not yet been paid. What happens in this case?
The current tenant is the contract renewal request period.
<Reporter>
That is an exception.
A new landlord, who was not aware of this change of law before July 31st, can ask the current tenant to move, even if the transfer of ownership has not yet been registered.
However, the government says that the tenant's right to apply for renewal of the contract is prioritized for contracts concluded after July 31st.
Let’s see another case.
The landlord does not change, but six months before the tenant's contract expires, the landlord accepted the renewal.
And after a few days, the owner changes his mind about living in the house.
Not even this one.
It is assumed that the tenant's right to apply for renewal of the contract has already been exercised, and the landlord cannot live in the next period.
On the contrary, the tenant requested a renewal of the contract and then changed his mind that he wanted to move.
Not even in this case.
The tenant can't just say'I want to leave, so I want to return my rent'.
However, unlike the landlord, tenants can leave three months after contract renewal.
You have to pay rent for those three months.
If you meet that, you will be able to move freely from 3 months after renewal.
So what if this is the case, the tenant changes his mind to request a renewal of the contract after the tenant offers to move.
In this case, even if the landlord is looking for a new tenant, the current tenant's right to renew the contract comes first.
If a new tenant has not yet been obtained, the tenant's right to change their mind and exercise the right to renew the contract takes precedence.